• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / D850 AF Adjust memory

D850 AF Adjust memory

January 30, 2018 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”.

Yesterday I tested two copies of the Sigma 50 mm f/1.4 Art lens on the D850 and found that one, serial number ending in 123,  took an AF Adjustment of 0 and the other, serial number ending in 370, needed +10. The D850 can remember the AF Adjustment values for lenses. But, at least in the case of this Sigma, it can’t tell two copies of the same model number apart. I set the +10 value into the camera with 370 mounted, then took it off and remounted 123, and the AF adjustment value for it, which had been 0, became +10.

There aren’t many amateur photographers who own two or more copies of the same lens so this little twist won’t affect them. However, some pros work from stockrooms supplied with lots of copies of a given model number, and this will affect them.

It’s worse than just the above. Here’s the skinny from nuke12 on DPR:

Every electronic F-mount lenses with EXIF  has a two byte lens ID number that the camera uses to identify the lens for focus tuning. If two lenses use the same number then the camera “sees” them as the same lens. Two Nikon lenses of the same model will be IDed by the camera as the same lens. After market lenses sometimes use the same number as a Nikon lens and that can cause problems.

You can find many of the ID numbers here;

http://www.rottmerhusen.com/objektives/lensid/thirdparty.html

 

Thom Hogan agrees, and points out a complication:

 Nikon does AF Fine Tune by lens model number. This makes for more of an issue than you might think, as the third party lens makers make up lens numbers, and Nikon sometimes then later uses them.

I looked at the EXIF data from images shot with 123 and 370. In both cases, the “Lens ID Number”  field is populated with “136”.

D850

← D850 with Sigma 50/1.4 ART, focus shift and AF-S D850 with Nikon 200/2 VR I, AF-S and lighting spectrum →

Comments

  1. Christoph Breitkopf says

    January 30, 2018 at 11:12 am

    It should be possible to make the lenses take the same adjustment by using the Sigma USB dock. According to the docs, it even supports different settings depending on distance (but not on aperture, apparently). This is probably not a solution for the “stockroom”-problem, though.

    Reply
  2. Bruce Oudekerk says

    January 30, 2018 at 4:19 pm

    What nuke12 says is true for a-mount lenses also where some aftermarket lens models might have the same ID. If I remember correctly, Tamron licensed ID numbers but Sigma didn’t. …don’t know about others.

    Both Sony a-mount and e-mount lenses typically have a 5 digit numeric ID. That’s not an issue with micro-focus adjust on e-mount but since the ID can potentially be duplicated, the lens identification from EXIF might be incorrect. Especially now that third party lenses for e-mount are becoming prevalent, I’d like someone to clarify this.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Štěpán Kaňa on A Modest Proposal
  • John Vickers on Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.