• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens summary part 2

Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens summary part 2

November 28, 2024 JimK Leave a Comment

In the previous post, I talked mostly about the mechanical operation of the Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens. In this one, I will summarize the optical performance.

Light falloff

The GF 30/5.6 T/S lens has a very large image circle for such a short focal length. This almost always comes with significant light falloff off axis. I ran some tests:

f/5.6, on axis, averaged

Wide open, there isn’t much falloff except in the extreme corners.

f/11, on axis, averaged

Stopping down to f/11 smooths things out somewhat.

To make if harder on the lens, let’s look at what happens with a full 15mm of shift.

f/5.6, 15mm shift, averaged

Stopping down helps there, too.

f/11, 15mm shift, averaged

Field curvature

It’s also hard to make short lenses with wide coverage that have flat focal fields. The 30/5.6 T/S has some odd waviness to its focal plane, shown below using the Roger Cicala field curvature test (Photoshop>Filter>Stylize>Find Edges). The images are composites of one shot made with the shift zeroed out and one with maximum shift.

Medium distance

 

Fairly close distance

Distortion

Like with field curvature and light falloff, it’s hard to make short, wide coverage lenses with low distortion. The GF 30/5.6 T/S lens has a bit of distortion when shifted, but in general is a good performer in this respect.

Distortion, no shift or tilt

 

Maximum shift

Sharpness

On axis, wide open, this lens is sharp as the proverbial tack.

On axis, f/5.6

Stopping down to f/8 provides no significant improvement, and stopping down further reduces sharpness due to diffraction.

Looking a the right edge with no shift also yields good performance, and a bit of astigmatism.

Right side, no shift, f/5.6

 

Shifting top make the above test more difficult:

Right side, 15mm shift, f/5.6

Still pretty sharp, and more astigmatism. There’s enough astigmatism that when focusing you need to decide which direction you want to faovr.

 

Let’s look at the edge with maximum shift at f/8:

Right side, 15mm shift, f/8

Not really any better.

Stopping down another whole stop makes things worse.

Right side, 15mm shift, f/11

This is a very impressive lens!

 

 

GFX 100 II

← Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens summary part 1 Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens summary part 3 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on A Modest Proposal
  • Brandon on A Modest Proposal
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.