• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100RF / Fuji GFX 100RF Siemens star testing

Fuji GFX 100RF Siemens star testing

August 23, 2025 JimK 11 Comments

I set up the GFX 100RF as follows.

  • Manual exposure
  • Manual focus
  • Red peaking, low
  • Arca Swiss Cube
  • Foba camera stand
  • 2-second self timer
  • 5 images in each setting
  • ISO 100
  • F-stops from f/4 through f/11
  • Shutter speeds adjusted to give equal exposure

Note that this regime eliminates focus curvature as a variable.

I developed the images as follows

  • Lr, with default settings except for the ones below.
  • White balanced to gray center area.
  • Slight Exposure boost to balance center and corner images.
  • Sharpening set to zero.
  • Sharpest image at each setting selected.
  • Cropped to 330×330 pixels.
  • Exported at 700×1000 pixels. That’s about 200%.

In the center:

GFX 100 RF, Center, f/4

 

GFX 100 RF, Center, f/5.6

 

 

Here

 

 

 

GFX 100 RF, Center, f/8

 

GFX 100 RF, Center, f/11

Looking really good. F/4 and f/5.6 are the sharpest apertures. Use f/11 if you want to eliminate aliasing.

In the corner:

GFX 100 RF, Corner, f/4

Fair amount of illumination falloff above. Still sharp.

GFX 100 RF, Corner, f/5.6

More even illumination, about as sharp.

GFX 100 RF, Corner, f/8

Diffraction costing us some sharpness.

GFX 100 RF, Corner, f/11

More diffraction.

This is a fine lens. It can certainly keep up with the sensor, even if the sensor can’t keep up with it. I’m having a hard time figuring out what the complaints are about. Testing notes: a few images were wildly out of focus. I’m not sure what caused that.

GFX 100RF

← Fuji GFX 100RF far-OOF bokeh, mechanical vignetting Fuji GFX 100RF Siemens star testing, corrections defeated →

Comments

  1. Bill says

    August 24, 2025 at 6:53 am

    GFX 100 RF, Corner, f/8
    Diffraction **costin ** us some sharpness.

    Proofreading costs too

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 24, 2025 at 10:09 am

      Thank you.

      Reply
  2. les cordes says

    August 25, 2025 at 3:20 pm

    is focus stacking on the docket or do the landscape junkies just get the bread crumbs ?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 25, 2025 at 3:29 pm

      I don’t think focus stacking will work any differently than on the other GFX 100x cameras. Why should it? What specifically do you want me to check?

      Reply
      • les cordes says

        August 25, 2025 at 9:47 pm

        verify the qualiy of the images: DOF and sharpness from front to back with this lens

        if one sinks $5k into the camera specifically for landscape this is critical and as far as i can tell untested

        Why not verify ?

        ill be happy to come down to Carmel and shoot a few series …

        this is important

        thanx .. les

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 26, 2025 at 5:17 am

          Sharpness at distance is verified by the Siemens star tests. DOF, in the absence of strong Spherical Aberration, is determined by geometric optics, not lens design. This should be a fine landscape lens, considering the size.

          Reply
          • les cordes says

            August 26, 2025 at 8:50 am

            thqnx doe gwthing bqck

            in vitro vs in vivo is about all
            i can say ..

            Reply
            • JimK says

              August 26, 2025 at 9:24 am

              The ability for abstraction is an important human characteristic.

              Reply
              • les says

                August 26, 2025 at 10:35 am

                jim: you have verified that the camera takes nice pictures and the lens is fine etc

                you have not .. i believe .. verified that the integrated, multifactorial process of performing a high quality focus stack can be accomplished . that is an assumption

                its probably a good assumption . but still

                Reply
                • JimK says

                  August 26, 2025 at 10:38 am

                  I’ll test it, but I would be flabbergasted if it didn’t work like the other GFX cameras.

          • les says

            August 26, 2025 at 8:57 am

            sorry for typos

            always appreciate you time, effort and support, jim

            Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

December 2025
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Nov    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Family photography with the X2D/XCD90V and the GFX 100 II/GF110
  • Jonathan on Family photography with the X2D/XCD90V and the GFX 100 II/GF110
  • Thomas on GFX 100 II pixel shift
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Pieter Kers on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Stefan Feaux de Lacroix on Fujifilm GFX 100RF inclusive review
  • Lou Jost on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Craig Stocks on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.