• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Choosing gear for high-magnification macrophotography

Choosing gear for high-magnification macrophotography

June 28, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

For the purposes of this post, I’m defining macrophotography as imaging at greater than life size on the sensor. In my case, that means working between 2× and 5× magnification on a 33 by 44 millimeter sensor, specifically the one in the Fujifilm GFX 100 II. That is a large sensor, so 5× allows printing at 30 or 40 times lifesize.

The core of my setup is a Cambo Ultima II, a technical camera that I’ve modified using the Cambo Actus upgrade kit. That lets me use Actus lens boards and camera mounts. I’m also using Cambo’s longest bellows, which gives me enough extension to reach 5× on the sensor with the Rodenstock 105 mm f/5.6 HR Digaron Macro lens. It does a good job, but I’ve asked Cambo to make me a custom lens board for the Mejiro Genossen FL0530 4.0/110 mm Macro Varon, which I expect will deliver better results at the high end of the magnification range.

I also have a Cambo Actus and a Swebo TC-1, but I chose the Ultima II for this task because it is sturdier and more resistant to vibration. When working at this level of magnification, even slight instability can spoil a frame. I’m using ES mode on the GFX 100II to minimize vibrations, and I’m letting the system settle down for 6 seconds after the rail moves. Typical stack depths are in the 100- to 150-exposure range.

To manage stacking and fine positioning, I’m using two Cognisys rails, one dedicated to stacking and the other to fine adjustment. For additional manual fine positioning, I’m using Swebo rails. Everything is tied together with a ragtag assemblage of Arca-dovetail rails and clamps. The stacking rail moves the subject rather than the camera, which is easier on the rail. The basic orientation of the setup is horizontal. But I often want to shoot downward, so I added a 1/20th wave mirror assembly from Edmunds, which I can mount in front of the lens when needed.

Lighting has been a bit of an evolution. I started with Adaptalux, which I liked in concept, but it just was not bright enough for me. I switched to small Aputure LED panels, which provide a lot more output. Since I often light from behind, I need a lot of photons. I use Rosco gels to shape and color the light.

At left, the GFX 100 II is mounted to a Cambo Ultima II with the longest available bellows, providing enough extension to reach 5× magnification with the Rodenstock 105 mm f/5.6 HR Digaron Macro lens. The technical camera has been upgraded with the Cambo Actus conversion kit, enabling the use of Actus lens boards and camera mounts.
Near the front of the lens is a 1/20th wave mirror assembly from Edmunds Optics, mounted for shooting subjects from above while maintaining a horizontal rig layout. The subject here, a slice of red onion in a Petri dish, is lit from behind using an Aputure LED panel with a red Rosco gel.

 

There are two Cognisys rails, both oriented parallel to the lens axis. Why is that? The lower rail moves the entire mirror/subject assembly. That works for both vertical and horizontal subject orientation. For horizontal subject orientation, the upper rail is redundant: you can use either for stacking. But for vertical orientation, the upper rail is used to position the subject in the camera’s field. The Swebo rails above are also used for that.

 

The Aputure charging station

 

 

Stacked from 101 images. Method=C (S=4)

The rig is not small, and it is not simple. But it works well for this kind of photography. The equipment itself is not the point, but at these magnifications, the right gear can be the difference between frustration and progress.

The Last Word

← On constraints In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2025
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Eugene on Don’t fixate on the bad stuff
  • Jonby on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • AVN on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • Markus on In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist
  • JimK on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Pieter Kers on Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star
  • JimK on Visualizing aberrations — caveats

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.