• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter

Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter

June 6, 2025 JimK 3 Comments

The Airy disk is the central bright region of the diffraction pattern produced when a point source of light passes through a circular aperture, such as a camera lens or a telescope objective. It represents the fundamental limit of resolution imposed by diffraction in an optical system with a circular pupil.

When light passes through a circular aperture, it does not form a perfect point on the image plane. Instead, due to diffraction, it spreads into a pattern of concentric rings. The Airy disk refers specifically to:

  • The central bright spot of this pattern

  • Surrounded by alternating dark and bright rings

  • Formed by constructive and destructive interference of diffracted light

This pattern is described mathematically by the square of the first-order Bessel function of the first kind, and its intensity drops off non monotonically with distance from the center.

The radius of the first dark ring (the first null) occurs at an angle where:

sin(theta) = 1.22 * lambda / D

Where:

    • theta is the angular radius of the Airy disk

    • lambda is the wavelength of light

    • D is the diameter of the aperture

  • The Airy disk sets the diffraction limit for optical resolution

  • Two point sources are just resolvable (by the Rayleigh criterion) when the center of one Airy disk coincides with the first minimum of the other

  • Smaller f-numbers (larger apertures) produce smaller Airy disks, allowing finer resolution

In practical photography, the Airy disk is rarely visible directly, but it governs the transition between lens-limited and diffraction-limited performance. It becomes increasingly important at small apertures (e.g., f/11 and smaller on full-frame sensors) or in precision optical systems like microscopes and telescopes.

There are lots of ways to measure the size of the Airy disk.

First Null Diameter (or First Minimum)
This is the most widely cited definition. It refers to the distance between the first zero of the Airy pattern intensity function.

Formula:
d_Airy = 2.44 * lambda * N
or, more generally:
d_Airy = 1.22 * lambda / NA

Where:

  • lambda is the wavelength of light
  • f is the focal length
  • N is the f-number
  • NA is the numerical aperture. In air, for distant subjects, NA ≈ 1 / (2 * N)

Use case: resolution limits, Rayleigh criterion, point spread function bounds.

Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM)
This is the width of the central Airy disk at half its peak intensity. It is narrower than the first-null diameter.

Approximate value:
FWHM ≈ 1.03 * lambda * N

Use case: practical resolution assessment, especially in astronomical imaging or Gaussian PSF fitting.

Encircled Energy Diameter
This is the diameter of a circle around the center of the Airy pattern that contains a specific fraction of the total energy.

Common values:

  • 50% energy: d_50 ≈ 1.03 * lambda * N
  • 70% energy: d_70 ≈ 1.60 * lambda * N
  • 80% energy: d_80 ≈ 1.75 * lambda * N
  • 90% energy: d_90 ≈ 2.00 * lambda * N

Use case: optical system performance, spot size characterization, fiber coupling efficiency, depth of field analysis. EE70 is a useful compromise between tight energy containment and sensitivity to aberrations.

RMS Spot Radius
This is the root-mean-square radius of the intensity-weighted distribution of the Airy pattern. There is no simple closed-form expression. It is usually evaluated numerically.

Use case: statistical blur modeling, system-level PSF assessment.

MTF Cutoff Frequency
Rather than a spatial diameter, sometimes the diffraction-limited cutoff frequency in the modulation transfer function (MTF) is used:

f_cutoff = 1 / (lambda * N)

The reciprocal of this frequency gives an effective resolution limit in Fourier space.

Use case: resolution assessment in frequency domain, image quality modeling.

Definition Approximate Formula Purpose
First null d = 2.44 * lambda * N Resolution limit
FWHM d ≈ 1.03 * lambda * N Practical PSF width
50% encircled energy d ≈ 1.03 * lambda * N Spot size, fiber coupling
70% encircled energy d ≈ 1.60 * lambda * N DOF modeling, general optical use
80% encircled energy d ≈ 1.75 * lambda * N Encircled energy performance
90% encircled energy d ≈ 2.00 * lambda * N Optical specification
RMS radius (computed numerically) Blur characterization
MTF cutoff f_c = 1 / (lambda * N) Frequency-domain resolution

For most of my work, I prefer the 70% encircled energy criterion, which is best for me to combine with other sources of blur.

 

While I’m at it, this is probably a good place to collect some of the common resolution limits for diffraction-limited optical systems.

Criterion Description Angular Resolution (radians) Image-Space Resolution (diameter)
Rayleigh First minimum of one Airy disk at center of the other 1.22 * lambda / D 2.44 * lambda * N
Sparrow No dip in intensity between two sources ~0.95 * lambda / D ~1.90 * lambda * N
Houston 5% dip in intensity between sources ~1.02 * lambda / D ~2.04 * lambda * N
FWHM (Gaussian) Full width at half maximum of central lobe (approximate) ~1.03 * lambda / D ~2.06 * lambda * N
Abbe Limit from coherent imaging, e.g., microscopy lambda / (2 * NA) lambda / (2 * NA)

The Last Word

← A Modest Proposal More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor →

Comments

  1. Try Veo 3 says

    June 6, 2025 at 10:49 pm

    It’s fascinating how the Airy disk, though invisible in most photography, still sets a hard limit on resolution—especially when stopping down lenses beyond their optimal aperture. This post is a great reminder that diffraction, not lens sharpness, is often the true bottleneck at smaller f-numbers.

    Reply
    • Jack Hogan says

      June 9, 2025 at 1:49 pm

      Not to nitpick, but aberrations tend to be the bottleneck at the smallest f-numbers in typical photographic lenses. This is why it is usually best not to shoot wide open for best sharpness.

      Reply
      • Christer Almqvist says

        June 11, 2025 at 2:26 am

        I would agree with that statement as far as it refers to lenses from the analogue era, with a few exceptions like the 35mm Summicron ASPH.

        When it comes to modern lenses like the Sony GM (and also G) lenses it is just not true. Yes, the resolution may be slightly better on paper if one closes the aperture one stop, but for all practical purposes, like printing on A3 paper, even with the image severely cropped, there is no reason to stop down. Except, of course, DOF. The price for that is higher ISO and/or slower shutter speed.

        I no longer look at resolution charts. More resolution required? Get a tripod.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Štěpán Kaňa on A Modest Proposal
  • John Vickers on Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.