• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Hasselblad XCD 35-100E f/2.8-4 summary

Hasselblad XCD 35-100E f/2.8-4 summary

December 29, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

In the previous post, I summarized my experience with the X2D II body. In this one, I’ll be talking about the new Hassy zoom.

This fast medium focal length variable aperture zoom was introduced with the new camera. It is a sizeable lens and tips the scale at about two pounds. It has three rings. The one closest to the body is used for aperture setting by default. The next one towards the front of the lens is for changing the focal length, and the furthest one away is for focusing. The texture of all three rings is the same, and I occasionally got confused as to whether I was moving the zoom ring or the focusing ring. I’m assuming that that confusion will disappear with time and experience. The focusing is internal, but the zooming is not; the lens extends another 2 inches or so from its 35mm setting when racked out to 100mm.

The lens is quite sharp from 35mm to about 70mm. At 100mm it’s an adequate performer and would be fine for many uses. I consider it a 35-70mm zoom with an overdrive range. There is little focus curvature at distances over 10 feet or so at all focal lengths, but I didn’t measure focus curvature at closer distances.

The lens has the, ahem, unusual bokeh that we’ve come to expect from the Hasselblad leaf shutter lenses when mechanical shutter is used at high shutter speeds. In this case, high speeds begin at about 1/250. The lens also suffers from onion ring bokeh, which is common in lenses with aspheric elements.

Mechanical vignetting is modest except at the widest focal lengths. Distortion is low for a lens of this category.

Focusing speed in AF mode is pretty much on a par with most medium format lenses. It’s fast enough for most uses, but you wouldn’t confuse it with one of Nikon’s fast-focusing lenses on a Z9. When combined with the X2D II, it will capture focus in most situations with moderate motion, which is a big improvement over any Hasselblad lens I’ve used on the Mark I X2D.

It’s not a cheap lens. Almost $5K. That doesn’t look bad compared to the Hasselblad XCD-V lenses, but the excellent Fuji 45-100mm GF zoom is about half that price.

For a lot of usage, you’d be better off with the Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 S zoom on a Z8. But If you’re already in the Hasselblad system, and you want the convenience of a mid-length zoom, I’d recommend the 35-100E. I’m putting my money where my mouth is; I bought the loaner copy from Lensrentals.

Technical details follow.

Out of focus point source at 1/4000 second with the mechanical shutter at 100 mm focal length.

1/4000

At a much slower shutter speed:

1/250

Illumination falloff at 35mm:

35mm, f/2.8

 

Illumination falloff at 100 mm:

100mm f/4

Mechanical vignetting at 100mm:

100mm f/4

Mechanical vignatting at 35mm:

35mm. f/2.8

 

A closer look at that:

35mm. f/2.8

 

Some Siemens star images at 150%^ magnification:

35mm center, f/2.8

 

60mm, center, f/4

 

100mm, center, f/4

 

35mm, corner, f/2.8

 

60mm, corner, f/4

 

100mm, corner, f/4

Focus curvature, measures with the Roger Cicala method (Ps -> Filter -> Stylize -> Find Edges).

60mm

 

35mm

 

100mm

 

Distortion, with Lr lens corrections off:

 

35mm

 

60mm

 

100 mm

 

Bokeh at longish shutter speeds:

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Hasselblad X2D II summary Counts vs DNs →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2026
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • CarVac on Hasselblad X2DII shadow noise analysis
  • bruce on Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors
  • bruce on Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors
  • JimK on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • Crack on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • JimK on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
  • Tom on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
  • JimK on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
  • Christer Almqvist on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
  • JimK on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner

Archives

Copyright © 2026 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.