• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist

In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist

June 30, 2025 JimK 1 Comment

One of the things that I love about photography forums is discussing things with people with whom I disagree. It’s often a learning experience, and I get to ideas that I would not have arrived at without the argument. Just yesterday, apropos of a discussion where I said that I consider cameras tools to make images, not toys, someone responded with: “Tools [imply] work…  Photography is not work for me[;] it is a joy.  I play with photography so my cameras etc … are toys.”

It got me thinking about the use of the word “work” in the arts. It is widespread:

  • “Show me your work.”
  • “What are you working on these days?”
  • “I think that image works.”
  • “That’s a work of art.”

The definition of work that is appropriate in this context is: “Activity involving mental or physical effort done to achieve a purpose or result.” Nowhere in that definition is the absence of joy.

For me, joy is part of the work of making art. Joy has also been part of the work that I did professionally, which was engineering. I’m not alone. When Hewlett-Packard shut down the Omega 32-bit computer project in the early 1970s, many of the engineers refused to stop working on the machine, even though they had been reassigned to other projects. They still came in nights and weekends to work on the project, even though management told them to stop. They finally had to lock the computer lab doors at night to keep the engineers from working on the computer. The engineers weren’t doing that to make money. They did it because they loved what they were doing.

When I hired people, I always looked for those for whom work and joy were consonant. I found that they did better work than someone who was just working for a paycheck, that they were more satisfied with their jobs, that they were better team players, and that they had a positive influence on morale, rather than the effect of someone who is just putting in the time.

I’ve learned from, talked with, and worked with many photographic artists over the years. Here are a few that come to mind:

  • Ansel Adams
  • Michael Kenna
  • Paul and John Caponigro
  • George Tice
  • Dan Burkholder
  • Ruth Bernhard
  • John Sexton
  • Huntington Witherill
  • Arthur Tress
  • Jerry Uselmann
  • Eugene Richards
  • Don Worth
  • Ted Orland
  • Jack Welpott

One thing all these people had in common is that they experienced great joy in doing the work of making art, and that they worked very hard at making art. Here’s a trivial example: watching John Sexton making prints in the darkroom is a lot like watching a dancer on the stage. Every move is executed beautifully, with precision, care, and, yes, joy.

I think that joy should be part of making art. It’s not antithetical to working hard, and I think the joy shows in the results.

[Added 7/14/2025]

Joy is an emotion. It’s typically understood as a positive feeling, something that arises in response to certain experiences or moments. In psychology, it’s considered one of the core emotional states, often associated with happiness, delight, or a deep sense of well-being. But joy isn’t necessarily constant or controllable; it tends to emerge spontaneously, often when we’re immersed in something meaningful, beautiful, or surprising.

That brings us to the question of how people think about joy. Is it something to pursue directly, or is it something that comes as a result of other pursuits? Many people see joy as a goal, a destination they can reach if they just choose the right path or mindset. But that framing can be problematic. Treating joy as a target can lead to frustration, because joy doesn’t always respond to effort in the way achievements do. You can plan for success, work for wealth, even schedule relaxation, but you can’t command joy to appear on demand.

Instead, it often makes more sense to think of joy as a byproduct, something that shows up when you’re doing something else with your full attention. It might come while you’re making art, solving a problem, helping someone, walking in the woods, or laughing with a friend. In those moments, you’re not aiming for joy; you’re absorbed in the process, and joy simply arises. That perspective suggests a quieter and more sustainable relationship with joy. It is not something to chase. It is something to notice when it visits.

The Last Word

← Choosing gear for high-magnification macrophotography A more accurate lens aberration simulation — caveats →

Comments

  1. Markus says

    July 1, 2025 at 5:45 am

    What is work?

    Short physical definition I keep remembering from probably middle school is this: “Work equals force times distance.”

    But really the term work is used for such a variety of topics, it’s almost like a religious relic. The mantra is to be productive, which I also see as a good thing, but it should be grounded in joy and good reason, not just for increasing the GDP.

    BTW: I really like “the last word” blog, have it even added to my Feedly RSS. There are not many out there, with that kind of high technical expertise, and at the same time readable to the kind of highly advanced amateurs, a group where I would consider myself in (once abandoned a study in electrical engineering, growingly more drawn to photography, graphic design and new media, which where I also then worked in various places).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2025
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Eugene on Don’t fixate on the bad stuff
  • Jonby on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • AVN on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • Markus on In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist
  • JimK on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Pieter Kers on Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star
  • JimK on Visualizing aberrations — caveats

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.