• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star

Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star

June 23, 2025 JimK 1 Comment

I’ve written a program to simulate lens aberrations, singly and in combination. For some of the limitations of the program, see the preceding post on this blog. In this post, I’ll use a grid of sinusoidal Siemens stars as the target. Later on, I’ll show results on real-world images. This post presents the main aberrations one at a time.

Lateral chromatic aberration, or LaCA, occurs when a lens focuses different wavelengths of light at slightly different positions in the image plane, but all in the same focal plane. This leads to color fringes near the edges of high-contrast features, especially near the corners of the image. Unlike longitudinal chromatic aberration, LaCA does not blur the image but causes misregistration of the red, green, and blue components. It is often strongest at the edges of the field and minimal or absent in the center. Correction typically involves aligning the color channels digitally or through lens design choices.

LaCA

Longitudinal chromatic aberration, or LoCA, arises when different wavelengths of light come to focus at different distances along the optical axis. This results in color-dependent blur: for example, red light may be in focus while blue light is slightly front- or back-focused. LoCA is most noticeable in out-of-focus regions and can cause magenta or green fringes around blurred edges. Unlike LaCA, which shifts colors laterally across the image, LoCA changes the sharpness of each color independently. It is most prominent at wide apertures and difficult to correct in postprocessing, making lens design the primary method of control.

LoCA

Spherical aberration (SA) occurs when light rays passing through the outer parts of a lens are focused at different points along the optical axis than rays passing through the center. This leads to a softening of the image, particularly around bright highlights, and can reduce overall contrast. SA is most apparent when the lens is used wide open and tends to decrease as the aperture is stopped down. It affects all colors equally and is typically most noticeable in the center of the image. Some lenses deliberately include controlled amounts of SA to produce a specific rendering style, especially in portrait photography.

Spherical Aberration

Astigmatism in a lens causes points of light to blur into lines rather than circles, with the blur orientation depending on the direction of the rays. It arises when the lens focuses horizontal and vertical details at slightly different distances, leading to a mismatch between sagittal and tangential focal planes. This results in image areas, especially away from the center, appearing stretched or smeared in one direction. The effect typically worsens toward the edges of the frame and can vary with focus distance and aperture.

Astigmatism

Coma is an aberration that affects off-axis points, causing them to appear as asymmetrical, comet-like smears rather than sharp points. It occurs because rays from different parts of the lens aperture are focused at slightly different positions in the image plane. The result is a flaring or tailing effect that radiates away from the image center, often most noticeable in high-contrast point sources like stars or distant lights. Coma increases with distance from the optical axis and is more pronounced at wider apertures.

Coma

Field curvature is an aberration where the sharp focus plane is not flat but curved, typically forming a shallow bowl shape. This means that when the center of the image is in focus, the edges and corners fall slightly out of focus, and vice versa. It arises because a simple lens projects a curved image surface rather than a flat one. In practical photography, field curvature can cause subjects at the edges of the frame to appear soft even if they lie in the same geometric plane as the center. Some modern lens designs partially correct for it, though not always completely.

Field Curvature

Tilt, in the context of aberration simulation, refers to a linear variation in focus across the image plane caused by the lens’s focal surface being angled relative to the sensor. Instead of being perpendicular to the optical axis, the focal plane is slanted, so one side of the image comes into focus sooner than the other. This can occur due to lens misalignment, manufacturing tolerances, or intentional use in tilt-shift photography to manipulate depth of field and focus placement. In simulations, tilt is often modeled as a planar defocus gradient across the frame.

Tilt

 

 

The Last Word

← Visualizing aberrations — caveats Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, peppers →

Comments

  1. Pieter Kers says

    June 26, 2025 at 1:40 am

    Thank you for these examples…
    I thought it needed some explaining but i see you added it here.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2025
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Jonby on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • AVN on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • Markus on In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist
  • JimK on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Pieter Kers on Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star
  • JimK on Visualizing aberrations — caveats
  • Stepan Kana on Visualizing aberrations — caveats

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.