• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Visualising lens aberrations — two at a time, Siemens star

Visualising lens aberrations — two at a time, Siemens star

June 25, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

In the past few posts, we’ve looked at the visual effects of lens aberrations one at a time. In this post, I’ll expand that to include the compound effects of allowing the aberrations to take place in pairs. In the list of caveats that I posted a few days ago, I mentioned that I am ignoring phase. That is especially relevant when considering combined aberrations. The number of combinations of 7 things take 2 at a time is, gulp, 21. So there are a lot of images to look at.

LoCA, LaCA

 

 

LoCA, Spherical Aberration

 

 

LoCA, Astigmatism

 

 

LoCA, Coma

LaCA, Coma

 

LoCa, Field Curvature

 

 

LoCA, Tilt

 

 

LaCA, Spherical Aberration

 

 

LaCA, Astigmatism

 

 

LaCA, Coma

 

 

LaCA, Field Curvature

 

 

LaCA, Tilt

 

 

Spherical Aberration, Astigmatism

 

 

Spherical Aberration, Coma

 

 

Spherical Aberration, Field Curvature

 

 

Spherical Aberration, Tilt

 

 

Astigmatism, Coma

 

 

Astigmatism, Field Curvature

 

 

Astigmatism, Tilt

 

 

Coma, Field Curvature

 

 

Coma, Tilt

 

 

Field Curvature, Tilt

 

 

The Last Word

← Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, fabric On constraints →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

November 2025
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Oct    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Paul R on Exposure metering
  • XUE on Dark Current in CMOS Sensors: Where It Comes From, and How Cooling Helps
  • Paul R on ISO setting for raw files
  • JimK on Pixel Response Non-Uniformity: Fixed Pattern Noise in the Light
  • Jared Bush on Pixel Response Non-Uniformity: Fixed Pattern Noise in the Light
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • JimK on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Colin Surprenant on Averaging captures, precision effects
  • JimK on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.