• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / How to… / How to shoot slanted edge images for me

How to shoot slanted edge images for me

In the past, I’ve done almost all my own captures for my testing. Thanks to my fall in January and the fact that I’m now using a walker and a wheelchair to get around, that’s going to change. I’ve always purchased only gear that I thought I might use in my own (non-testing) photography. I’m still going to be doing that, but now my photographic horizons have been forced to narrow to what I can do in the studio, which is going to mean mostly macro work. That’s so far removed from the photography that most of my readers do that it means I won’t be testing a lot of gear that’s meaningful to them. The new GF lenses — the 30 T/S, 55/1.7,  etc — are a case in point. It hasn’t taken much arm twisting to get me to agree to test lenses and cameras with other people making the captures.

I do a lot of slanted edge testing, and I’ll start there. The purpose of this page is to give instructions to those who wish to make slanted edge captures for me to analyze. I’ll try to balance my guidance to those things that are necessary, but I’ve found that there are lots of ways that these instructions can go wrong, so they’ll be fairly detailed.

Let’s start out with a visual. This is the sort of thing I’m looking for.

What we have here is a low-contrast slanted edge target with a zone plate  for focusing.

  • The target is printed on F-finish (Baryta) paper on an inkjet printer. It is rotated between 5 and 12 degrees — clockwise  or counterclockwise, the direction doesn’t matter — so that the edges are slanted.
  • The target is centered.
  • The lighting is diffuse so that there are no specular reflections from the surface of the paper.
  • The lighting is not too far from D55.
  • The exposure is such that the paper white of the target is a stop or a bit more down from saturation.
  • The image is made at base ISO.
  • The distance from the subject to the camera is about 100 times the focal length of the lens (with a 50mm lens, that’s 5 meters distance). That’s a good number for 33x44mm sensors. For FF sensors, use around 140 times the focal length (7 meters with that 50 mm lens). For APS-C ones, use about 200 times the focal length (10 meters with a 50 mm lens).
  • The camera is on a sturdy tripod and the self-timer was used to trip the shutter.
  • The camera was in electronic shutter mode to minimize vibrations (EFCS is OK for all but the longest focal lengths).
  • Critical focus was achieved (I did it with focus bracketing. You can do that, or you can make 3 or 4 exposures at each setting and let me pick the sharpest.
  • The camera was set to produce a raw file. I want raw files from you all.
  • I made images at whole f-stop spacing from wide open to f/11. I’d like you  to do the same.

Ideally, I’d like you all to do the same things. But this test can deal with some variations. If you’re having trouble with reflections from the target, use matte paper and get twice as far away. If you’re outside, and you may need to go outside to get the distance you need, put the target in open shade or shoot on a cloudy day.

You can also place the target on the right hand side of the image. That, combined with the centered-target images like the one above, will allow me to do some calculations I can’t do with the target in the center. Here’s what that looks like:

Try to get the target perpendicular to the lens axis, but don’t worry if it’s not lined up perfectly.

Here’s a low resolution version of the target I’d like you to use:

I’ll try to find a place to host the high-resolution version of the target. For now, send me a PM on DPR.

If you want to be precise about the target distances, here’s a table you can use:

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.