• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Lens screening testing / Examples / Problematic 400 mm FF lens

Problematic 400 mm FF lens

A reader performed this test with a Sony FE 100-400 mm lens mounted on a Sony a7RII. The target was a Zeiss Siemens Star, and the distance was 25 meters, which gave quite a generous target size on the sensor. The reader used auto exposure, so the shutter speeds and target brightness was different in the various images. I have since added a sentence in bold to the capture instructions saying that you should use manual exposure mode; it was previously implied but not explicit.

These are 862×777 pixel crops, slightly downsampled down for the web.

Center

Focus looks good, but I would have preferred the target be more distant so we aren’t using just the central portion of the star.

Here are the opposing pairs:

Upper Left
Lower Right

The color balance is quite different. I balanced to the chart background in the centered image. I’m thinking that there is some twist in the profile that’s causing the different WB with different amounts of exposure compensation.

The upper image is substantially softer than the lower one. A particular concern is that the lower left portion of the star is quite soft, while the part on the other side is not.

Top

 

Bottom

The top looks just slightly sharper than the bottom, but not enough to matter. 

Upper Right

 

Lower Left

The upper right is softer, and it’s softest for vertical lines. This could be camera motion; the image was made at 1/10 second shutter speed. If this is repeatable, the lens looks problematic.

Right

 

Left

These look fine.

This lens may have a problem with both the upper right and upper left corners. It doesn’t look like just a tilt issue since the top center image is fine. I will ask the reader to repeat the test using manual exposure.

January 2026
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Dom on Exposure strategies for the Fuji GFX 50S — numbers
  • JimK on Exposure strategies for the Fuji GFX 50S — numbers
  • Dom on Exposure strategies for the Fuji GFX 50S — numbers
  • CarVac on Hasselblad X2DII shadow noise analysis
  • bruce on Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors
  • bruce on Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors
  • JimK on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • Crack on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • JimK on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
  • Tom on Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner

Archives

Copyright © 2026 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.