• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm GF 30/5.6 Tilt/Shift lens on GFX 100 II — Siemens star

Fujifilm GF 30/5.6 Tilt/Shift lens on GFX 100 II — Siemens star

November 9, 2024 JimK Leave a Comment

Lensrentals has loaned me a Fujifilm 30 mm f/5.6 tilt/shift (T/S) lens to test. I mounted it on a GFX 100 II and aimed it at a Zeiss Siemens star about 20 feet away.

I mounted the camera on an Edelkrone tripod, using an Arca Swiss C1 cube.  I made 4 exposures at each setting, focusing manually with maximum magnification and low peaking. I picked the sharpest image at each setting. I used the 10 second self timer to deal with vibration. I developed the images in Lightroom, white balanced them to the center of the star, and set sharpening to zero. I’ll show you some crops at a bit over 250% magnification.

On axis, f/5.6

On axis, the performance is excellent. I will test later, but it’s hard for me to imagine that things will get much better here if I stop down.

Right side, no shift, f/5.6

On the right side of the landscape-oriented image, the contrast for tangential lines is great, but the radial lines are suffering a bit.

Now let’s make things tough on the lens, by applying 15 mm of shift to the left, and still looking on the far right side of the image.

Right side, 15mm shift, f/5.6

 

All things considered, this is outstanding performance.

Now we’ll stop down.

Right side, 15mm shift, f/8

The sharpness at f/8 is actually a hair worse than wide open.

Right side, 15mm shift, f/11

Diffraction is costing us here.

Right side, 15mm shift, f/16

Still more diffraction.

Wow!

Testing notes:

I didn’t use the lens collar for this test. The focusing ring is fine-geared enough to make precise focusing easy. The controls seem well thought out. The shift and tilt axes are variable. The lens shade unscrews, but the front element of the lens would be easy to damage with the lens shade off.

GFX 100 II

← Should I buy a medium format digital camera? Fujifilm GF 30/5.6 T/S lens, usage notes for view camera users →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.