• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / a7RIII AF-S/C accuracy with 100-400 at 400 mm

a7RIII AF-S/C accuracy with 100-400 at 400 mm

January 21, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Sony a7RIII.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7RIII”. 

I’ve gotten some questions about how the a7RIII’s AF-S does with the large spot size, and there have been reports that AF-C is more consistent with large spot size. Now that I have my long ramp setup, I can find out. I set up the Sony 100-400 mm and set the focal length to 400 mm. I made a series of 10 exposures at f/5.6 through f/11 at 1/3 stop intervals at a distance of 6.8 meters. At that distance, the ramp occupied most of the height of the frame. This made for much slower number crunching, forcing me to take several hours to recode my analysis software for parallelism. When that was done, here’s what I got for the large spot size, with AF-S on, AF release priority, flexible spot, and Setting Effect on.

The dots are the samples, for each Adobe RGB color plane, with 10 shots per f-stop. The lines are the averages for all ten shots. Negative numbers indicate front-focusing. The image-plane shift is in micrometers (um).  The blue focus locations are separated from the red and green ones because of the longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) of the lens. Except for the LoCA, that looks great. Here are the circles of confusion (CoC) implied by those focal plane errors:

 

You can’t beat that. The lens is focusing to within one pixel spacing.

With the medium spot:

And the CoCs:

Very nice.

Small spot size:

 

 

In this case, the spot size doesn’t appear to make much difference. And this lens is focusing fantastically well at this focal length.

Switching to AF-C (also with AF priority), and back to the large spot size:

The lens now has a tendency to front-focus, and the sample spreads are greater than with AF-S. With AF-S, the lens on average back-focused as you start to stop it down. With AF-C, the focus just moves slightly forward as you stop down.

The CoCs:

Average CoC diameter is between one and two pixel pitches. This is probably plenty good enough for action. There are plenty of samples that are much worse than that, though.

Now medium spot size:

Not dramatically wore than large spot size. The f/8 dataset has 20 samples.

CoCs:

Same front bias. About the same scatter.

Before we give the a7RIII credit for correcting focus shift, we need to find out how much the lens has:

 

 

The answer is the lens has hardly any focus shift at that focal length. So the credit for the great AF performance variation with aperture goes to the lens.

 

 

a7RIII

← a7RIII AF-S accuracy with Zony 55/1.8 D850 AF-S/C accuracy with 80-400 at 400 mm →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.