• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — measuring tilt error

Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — measuring tilt error

November 14, 2024 JimK Leave a Comment

Lensrentals has loaned me a Fuji GF 30mm f/5.6 tilt/shift lens. In the previous post, I looked at tilt-related focus error as a function of the amount of unwanted tilt at various apertures. In this post, I’ll test my (borrowed) copy of the 30/5.6 GF T/S lens for tilt-related focus error. I can do this fairly easily because the lens has a rotating collar.

In the first of two tests, I locked the tilt and shift at putative zero. I put the lend on a GFDX 100 II, put camera in landscape orientation, rotated it 90 degrees counterclockwise in the collar, centered a Siemens star in the middle of the long side of the image, and focused with the lens wide open.

I made an exposure. Then I rotated the camera 90 degrees clockwise, and made another exposure without refocusing. Then another 90 degrees CW and another exposure.

Here they are at a bit over 200% magnification:

Focused on top edge

 

Left side when focused on top edge

 

Right side when focused on top edge

There’s very little loss in sharpness at the two rotated images. That indicates to me that the tilt lock of my copy is good enough to use the lens successfully with tilt and shift zeroed, without worrying about tweaking the tilt.

Here’s a somewhat more difficult test. I focused on the left side in landscape orientation, and inverted the camera by twisting it in the collar.

 

 

Focused left edge.

 

Right edge when focused on left edge

We haven’t lost much sharpness there, either.

So far, so good. Next up: big shifts.

GFX 100 II

← Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — allowable tilt error Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — distortion →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.