• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm GFX 100 II EDR vs shutter speed

Fujifilm GFX 100 II EDR vs shutter speed

September 28, 2023 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the third post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm GFX 100, Mark II, which was released this week. You can find all the posts in this series by going to the Categories pane in the right hand panel and clicking on “GFX 100 II”.

In the previous two posts, we saw how engineering dynamic range (EDR), a measure of read noise, varied with ISO setting on the GFX 100 II. Now let’s see how it varies with shutter speed. I set the ISO to 1000, and made images at one-third stop shutter speed intervals from 1/4000 second to 60 seconds, using EFCS and 14-bit precision.

Except for the G1 channel, that’s pretty much what I’d expect. But that channel looks weird. I upgraded the camera to Release 1.1 firmware, and made another set of dark-field exposures.

Pretty similar. I wonder what’s going on.

Looking at the raw spectra of the 50 second exposure (file 241) and compare that with the 1/4000 second exposure (file 188):

This presentation doesn[‘t show the absolute amount olf noise, in fact it[‘s normalized to the noise amplitude. It does show how the noise varies with spatial frequency in two directions. I don’t see anything significant here. There’s more noise in file 241 — the 50 second image — and that has the effect of suppressing the tall spike in file 188.

 

 

 

There is an odd periodicity to the horizontal frequency in this plane, which makes me suspicious of in-camera processing.

 

 

There’s more lowpass filtering in the 50-second image.

 

 

Again we have the horizontal periodicity.

Sometimes numbers just don’t do it; you have to take a look. Here are the 1/4000 second and the 60 second images developed in Adobe Camera Raw with default settings except exposure +5, contrast +100, shadows +100, and blacks +100.

60 seconds

There is a green tinge to the right hand side of the image.

1/4000 sec

There’s a little green, but a whole lot less.

Is this a sample issue? I’ll try to find out.

 

GFX 100 II

← Fujifilm GFX 100 II EDR, spectra, 16-bit precision Fujifilm GFX 100 II: more on EDR vs shutter speed →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.