• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / How fast is the GFX 100 electronic shutter?

How fast is the GFX 100 electronic shutter?

August 9, 2019 JimK 4 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100”.

In the past, I’ve measured the scan time of electronic shutters by photographing an analog oscilloscope trace of the output from a function generator. That was effective, but it took a while to set up and was a difficult experiment for some people to understand. So these days, I’ve been using a quick-and-dirty method: photographing light from an LED that’s modulated at 120 Hz. I used single shot losslessly compressed raw at about 1/4000 second shutter speed. The high shutter speed was chosen to force the bands to be better defined, and thus easier to count.

Here’s the image with 16-bit raw precision, and electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS):

EFCS

Now with the electronic shutter (ES) enabled, single shot mode, and 14-bit raw precision:

14-bit electronic shutter

The LED cycles at 120 Hz, which means the spacing between the dark lines is 8.33 milliseconds (ms). There are 19.5 bands from top to bottom. That means it took the shutter 8.33*19.5 =  162 ms to make the trip. That’s about 1/6 of a second.

Now setting the raw precision to 16 bits:

16-bit electronic shutter

Now there are 42 bands. 8.33*42 = 350 ms, or about 1/3 of a second.

You have been warned.

 

GFX 100

← A visual look at GFX 100 focus bracketing step sizes Quantifying the Fuji GFX 100 focus bracket step size →

Comments

  1. Robert Kosara says

    August 9, 2019 at 10:21 am

    Hi, I think you’re making an assumption here that the readout is entirely sequential. But what if, say, four reads are happening in parallel? This test can’t show you that, but the oscilloscope test (which I think is brilliant btw) will.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 9, 2019 at 10:54 am

      I’ve never seen an ES readout that wasn’t sequential by row.

      Reply
      • Rico Pfirstinger says

        August 9, 2019 at 11:14 am

        I assume he refers to this: https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a9-electronic-shutter-operation-single-shot/

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 9, 2019 at 11:35 am

          Yeah, on a micro level it’s not, but on a macro level it is. The LED light test gives the same scan time for the a9 as the ‘scope test.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.