• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100S II / Fujifilm GFX 100S II EDR

Fujifilm GFX 100S II EDR

August 29, 2024 JimK 10 Comments

Lensrentals has loaned me a Fuji GFX 100S II for testing. Today I’m reporting on engineering dynamic range (EDR).

In single shot mode at putative 14-bit precision:

Same as the GFX 100 II, including the odd results at ISO 80, which in that camera was the result of gratuitous in-camera black point processing.

In single shot mode at putative 16-bit precision:

Like with the GFX 100 II, 16 bit precision doesn’t appreciably improve the EDR.

Here are both of the above plots on the same graph:

In CH5 mode:

Same as 14 bit single shot mode. There is no 16-bit CH5 mode.

CH7 mode:

 

CH7 is noisier than CH5.

 

 

GFX 100S II

← Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision Good Enough →

Comments

  1. Julian says

    August 30, 2024 at 2:09 pm

    Hi love all the work you do to report on the specifics of these rarer cameras. Perhaps this is a silly question but do you know the benefit of shooting in 16-bit mode on this particular camera if the EDR difference is nil? Is it just more complex / accurate color in the details? Is there a way to test for that? Cheers

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 30, 2024 at 2:55 pm

      I see little reason to use 16-bit precision on this camera. The black point at very short exposure appears to be somewhat more accurate, but that’s about it.

      Reply
      • Julian says

        August 30, 2024 at 3:29 pm

        Thanks for the explanation! Would it be possible to include a graph with the 16-bit and 14-bit single shot mode overlaid so we can more easily spot the minor differences? Please ignore if that’s already been done on a previous article.

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 30, 2024 at 4:38 pm

          I added that graph to the post.

          Reply
  2. Jared Bush says

    August 31, 2024 at 9:16 am

    This is probably a question that has been asked before, but why the 1 stop drop in dynamic range between ISO 400 and 500?

    Why is it not “linear?”

    Can you point to a post discussing this?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 31, 2024 at 9:46 am

      https://www.photonstophotos.net/Aptina/DR-Pix_WhitePaper.pdf

      Reply
  3. Jared Bush says

    August 31, 2024 at 9:32 am

    Increase, not decrease.

    Reply
  4. Weston Harby says

    November 13, 2024 at 12:37 pm

    Seems that there isn’t much difference between 14 vs 16 bit precision for normal shooting. Does the story change when using pixel shift since increases the DR?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 13, 2024 at 1:12 pm

      No, although 16-bit precision is useful when averaging a bunch of 14-bit images.

      Reply
  5. Andrey says

    November 21, 2024 at 1:19 pm

    Thank you for the test, very interesting.
    Compared to gfx 100s iso 100, iso 80 on gfx 100s II and 100II is higher, slightly above 14 stops. If I understand correctly being that the sensor is the same it’s just some kind of postprocessing or is there a real benefit with DR on new bodies, or I’m safe to buy the older one.
    Thank you!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.