• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100S II / Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision

Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision

August 28, 2024 JimK 6 Comments

Lensrentals has loaned me a Fuji GFX 100S II for testing. My first test was to measure the precision in various drive modes:

  • Single shot, 14 bit
  • Single shot, 16 bit
  • CL
  • CH 5 fps
  • CH 7 fps

The results, all with the camera in EFCS mode:

14 bit precision

 

16 bit precision

 

14 bit precision

 

14 bit precision

 

12 bit precision

So, the answers are:

  • Single shot, 14 bit — 14 bits
  • Single shot, 16 bit — 16 bits
  • CL — 14 bits
  • CH 5 fps — 14 bits
  • CH 7 fps — 12 bits

 

GFX 100S II

← Hasselblad XCD 135/2.8 vs Zeiss 135/2 Apo-Sonnar, Siemens star, corner Fujifilm GFX 100S II EDR →

Comments

  1. Julian says

    August 30, 2024 at 2:15 pm

    Does “precision” mean color accuracy? I’m not sure how to interpret the graphs. I see the curves are much smoother and the y-axis values are magnitudes higher for 16-bit, but unsure what that means in the real world without accompanying text. Thanks for looking into this is as it’s a major selling point for the camera system.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 30, 2024 at 2:54 pm

      Does “precision” mean color accuracy?

      Precision and accuracy are technically almost orthogonal. Precision in this case means the number of bits that the analog to digital converters are putting out. Look for gaps in the histograms to see values which the ADCs aren’t coding, even if they get slightly filled in with post-ADC processing.

      Reply
  2. Paolo Madamba says

    November 8, 2024 at 10:43 am

    So does that mean in continous shooting, even if I set the bit rate to 16 it still only shoots at 14?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 8, 2024 at 11:04 am

      “bit rate”? I don’t see a setting for bit rate. You can’t set what Fuji calls “output depth”, by which they mean precision, to 16 bits in either Ch or Cl drive modes.

      Reply
  3. Renjie Zhu says

    May 1, 2025 at 1:47 am

    I use the raw digger to analyze my image taken by GFX 100 II, CH 8, 35mm mode, the precision looks like same as single shot 14bit, there is no obvious skip sampling gap there. Guess the less pixel s relief the cache writing pression.

    For Bird photography, choose 35mm mode CH8.
    Bird in fly scenario with image compress can last the shooting for 60 seconds.

    For large wild life photography, full frame, CH 5 is good choice.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 1, 2025 at 6:42 am

      Thanks for that.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.