• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / The return of the mainframe, part 5

The return of the mainframe, part 5

June 14, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

The last of the cloud disadvantages/concerns:

Availability.  The reliability component of availability is one of the selling points of cloud computing, but it’s also one of the problems. If you’re selling cloud computing, you point out that your systems are highly redundant and maintained by expert technicians. If you have a more jaundiced point of view, you note that cloud systems are much more complicated than the home or small business systems that they replace, and with that complexity comes opportunity for (mostly human) error. For an example of the level of complexity involved in some cloud services, read Amazon’s explanation of the April outage  http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/.

Even if the cloud proponents accepted that individual cloud computing services are less likely to become unavailable than their homegrown brethren, they would have to admit that a failure in a cloud computing cluster affects lots of users. The Amazon EC2 outage. Multiple Salesforce outages. Assorted Google outages going back more than two years. The Microsoft Azure and Sidekick outages. There are examples galore.

Even if your cloud supplier’s computers humming along like tops, if your Internet access is not working, neither is your cloud application. I have used many Internet service providers, and not one of them has anywhere near the reliability of my LAN. Ask yourself if your experience is similar.

Portability. In this context, portability means being able to move to another cloud service provider or to an in-house implementation of the service, taking your data with you. There are two components to this: gaining access to your cloud-stored data, and getting it into a form usable by your new implementation.

Consider cloud music storage. Can you download the music files that you paid for? What happens to the digital rights management associated with those files if you do so? Can you get the files into a format readily translatable to almost any music player? It’s easy to imagine scenarios where purchasing music from one cloud vendor essentially locks you into that vendor, unless you’re willing to repurchase your music from somebody else.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← The return of the mainframe, part 4 The return of the mainframe, part 6 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.