• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / VoIP — part 5

VoIP — part 5

September 2, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

After I decided on the NEC SV 8100 PBX, the next big decision was selecting an IP trunk vendor. In this country, Internet Protocol trunks are usually called SIP trunks, after the Session Initiation Protocol that most of them use. I looked at two choices: AT&T and Appia. The AT&T solution required replacing my existing AT&T router. AT&T said that the operation couldn’t be done without running both the old and the new router in parallel, and I didn’t have enough copper pairs to make that happen. I had already dealt with Appia when I was looking at cloud solutions, so I agreed to give them a try.

The first problem occurred when the contract arrived. I needed to sign up for a year, but, since I was getting my Internet service from AT&T rather than Appia, Appia did not guarantee that anything would work. The installers had a set of test Appia SIP trunks, so I agreed to start with them, and sign a contract with Appia once I was satisfied with the results. The Appia pricing was pretty attractive: six virtual trunks, 800 countrywide minutes a month, all for less than 100 bucks a month. However, I really wanted to find out what the quality would be like; hundred bucks is no bargain for lousy reliability or voice quality.

I had the installer leave the old PBX in place, tied to its analog trunks. I signed up for call forwarding with AT&T, and programmed the trunks to unconditionally forward to the pilot number for the Appia SIP trunks. With that set up, it would be easy to go back to the old PBX if something bad happened to the new one. The installer installed all the IP phones, including two portable phones that use Wi-Fi to connect to the PBX. We programmed the calling party ID number for outgoing calls made on the Appia SIP trunks to the pilot number for the old analog trunks, so people receiving calls from the new PBX wouldn’t be confused about who was calling them.

Over the next couple of days, we found two problems with the Appia SIP trunks.

When we called some numbers from the IP phones, we would get no call progress tones (ringing, busy etc.) other numbers worked just fine. After many days of calls to the Appia tech-support line, we finally traced the problem. Calls made to numbers which gave call progress by sending back packetized audio information worked fine. Calls made to numbers which gave call progress by sending back an indication to the PBX to play call progress tone X didn’t work. Appia blamed the PBX. The PBX installers, after working several hours and spending some time on the phone with NEC tech-support, were not able to fix it.

Some calls to land lines had dropped packets from the distant party, which decreased naturalness at low incidences, and made the distant party unintelligible when a lot of packets were dropped. There seemed to be no pattern to this, but it did seem to affect quiet conversations more than louder ones.

After several weeks of not being able to fix the problems, I decided to abandon the Appia SIP trunks, and connect the analog trunks to the PBX. In a year or so, when my router needs to be replaced, I will consider AT&T SIP trunks.

A few days after I decided to drop Appia, but before I could do anything about it, all incoming calls started to receive a fast busy signal. Outgoing calls worked, but showed a number I’d never heard of in the calling party ID field. A week’s worth of troubleshooting with Appia proved fruitless; they said it was a PBX problem, but we couldn’t find anything that had changed on the PBX.  These problems made me really glad I was dropping Appia. I took the call forwarding off the old analog trunks and went back to using to old PBX while I waited for the installers to switch the analog trunks to the new PBX.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← VoIP — part 4 VoIP — part 6 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.