• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / X-Rite I1 Publisher/I1 Pro OOBE, part 6

X-Rite I1 Publisher/I1 Pro OOBE, part 6

May 3, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

I got an e-mail from X-Rite support this afternoon asking for more information. I sent it off.

Meanwhile, encouraged by the fact that I had finally made a profile, albeit a terrible one, I started over. I printed a new 400-sample test target, and was able to measure it with only one bad row. After the measurements Publisher generated a profile with an entirely reasonable looking gamut. I took the next step and asked Publisher to print out the 400 patches that it thought would best enable it to optimize the profile. The test page came out in portrait orientation, and I couldn’t figure out any way to switch it back to landscape. I ignored that detail, printed it, measured it without much drama, and let it generate an optimized profile.

I installed the profile, fired up Photoshop, loaded one of Charlie Cramer’s test images, and printed it. The result was very good, surprisingly good when you consider that the profile was constructed from only 800 color patches (counting both the original profile generation and the optimization step).

A lesson learned: if Publisher doesn’t supply audible prompts during the measurement phase of the profile generating process, stop and figure out how to make it give you those prompts. There is a greater delay between pressing the measurement button on the spectrophotometer and the time that you can actually start to move it than I would’ve thought. That was probably the source of most of my difficulties at the beginning. The weird thing is that I have no idea what I did to get the audible prompts. I hope they’re there for good.

Another lesson:  When you’re done measuring a page, whether I1 Publisher thinks it’s a good page or not, look carefully at the color that Publisher thinks each square should be and compare it to the color that you measured. If they’re wildly off, redo that row. If you see a bad row, you can go back and re-measure it by holding down the right mouse button and dragging the red frame that indicates the row you’re measuring to the row that you want to re-measure.

I may be a convert.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← X-Rite I1 Publisher/I1 Pro OOBE, part 5 X-Rite I1 Publisher/I1 Pro OOBE, part 7 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.