• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Using in-camera histograms for ETTR / Preparing for monitor-based UniWB

Preparing for monitor-based UniWB

White balancing in the camera to an image on a monitor requires more than one exposure; all the methods have similar setup requirements:

Turn off power-saving and screen blanking software. Let the monitor warm up for half an hour. You don’t want the monitor to be changing during the process. Half an hour is probably overkill for an LED backlight, but it’s not too long for a florescent one.

Darken the room. You want your images to be repeatable, and the easiest way to avoid extraneous changes in the monitor is by eliminating any other source of illumination.

Put the camera on a tripod. If you take it off the tripod to read out the images, make sure you can put it back in the same place. A quick-release mount helps a lot here. Mark the place where the tripod’s feet go with tape in case you jostle or kick it during the calibration.

Line the camera lens up perpendicular to the screen. It doesn’t have to be perfect, especially for Newton’s method. For gridded search, lens-axis/screen orthogonality will reduce errors and therefore the number of iterations.

Use a fairly long lens. LCD brightness and color varies with viewing angle, and you want all the ray angles approximately perpendicular to the plane of the screen. A 135mm lens on a full frame camera, a 90mm lens on an APS-C camera, or a 70 mm lens on a four-thirds or micro four-thirds camera is long enough. If you can’t use a long lens, Newton’s Method is probably your best bet.

Defocus the lens. If you don’t defocus the lens, you can get moiré patterns that somewhat affect the color as the pitch of the camera’s pixels interacts with the pitch of the monitor’s pixels. You don’t have to defocus very far. If you use Newton’s Method (see below) you can defocus are far as you want. If you use the gridded search approach, don’t defocus so far that you can’t find the grid.

Use a longish exposure. You don’t want the screen’s refresh rate to influence the images. I suggest a tenth of a second or longer, although I admit that that’s conservative.

Stop down the lens a couple of stops or more. This minimizes corner falloff. This is quite important for the gridded search method, and not so important for Newton’s Method.

Use the base ISO setting. You want to minimize the amount of noise in your images. Setting the ISO control to the lowest setting that’s not a “pull” will minimize the noise. Don’t worry about your exposures getting too long; even if they’re a second or two, it’ll be just fine.

Use a calibrated monitor. This is not a firm requirement for some methods. Newton’s Method will probably converge faster with a calibrated monitor, and any starting points obtained from other people will depend on monitors having similar characteristics.

Next: A one-step UniWB procedure

 
 

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    September 5, 2015 at 1:10 pm

    Nit/typo

    > “I suggest a tent of a second or longer”

    I suppose you mean “tenth of a second”?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      September 6, 2015 at 5:59 pm

      Fixed. Thanks. Jim

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Uni-White Balance on a D850 - The Doctor's ImagesThe Doctor's Images says:
    June 2, 2018 at 1:44 am

    […] have personally used the method described by Jim Kasson on his blog. Since you are also free to use this resource I will not précis it here, suffice to […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.