• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V lens on X2D

Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V lens on X2D

December 1, 2023 JimK 3 Comments

It’s taken almost a year to write this review. I received a review copy of the Hasselblad XCD 90 mm f/2.5 V lens in January. I performed most of my evaluations in the spring of last year. And then I waited for the lens to ship so that I could publish my thoughts.

And waited.

And waited some more.

Yesterday, customer shipments began. So now I can talk about the lens. But there’s an issue.

The Hasselblad folks tell me that there have been design changes to the lens so that the copy that I’ve been testing is not representative of what’s currently shipping. So take what I have to say with a grain of salt. Also, because of the possibility of differences between what you, gentle readers, can buy and what I’m testing, I won’t publish quantitative results until I get my hands on a production version.

Usually when I test a new piece of photo gear, I publish the results as I perform the testing, and towards the end I produce a summary. Because the testing took place so long ago, I will reverse that, and start out with the summary.

I quite like the lens.

  • It’s small and light
  • It’s got the same haptics as the 38/2.5 V I already own, and I like the way the lens handles.
  • I especially like the switching between manual and autofocus, and the distance indicator and DOF markings when the lens is in manual focus mode.
  • Because size and weight was apparently prioritized in the design of the lens, there is quite a bit of light falloff towards the periphery of the image, especially at the widest f-stops. This can be corrected with a lens profile, at the expense of loss of dynamic range at the edges and corners of the image.
  • Field curvature is impressively well controlled at landscape distances.
  • The lens is quite sharp in the center.
  • There is some softness in the edges and corners from wide open until f/4. Again, I think this is the result of keeping the lens small and light. But great things happen when you stop down a bit. At f/4 and narrower, it’s very sharp at the periphery.
  • Bokeh is quite good.
  • The new high-speed shutter is quite loud for a leaf shutter. This morning I got lens firmware that is supposed to reduce the intensity of the sound at slower shutter speeds. I will test that and let you all know the results.

I think this would make an excellent walk-about lens. Mounted on the relatively svelte X2D body, it provides good balance and handling. It would also excel in landscape use, especially if hiking any distance is involved. If and when we get continuous autofocus, it should make a good lens for events, although my first choice for events would probably be a full frame camera.

 

 

 

X2D

← Why Foveon images are so noisy Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD-V on X2D — Siemens star →

Comments

  1. Marko says

    December 2, 2023 at 4:54 am

    Jim, do you know, if the »design changes« apply to the internal lenses? At least the documents / spec sheets for the 90V at the Hasselblad site have not been changed since fall 2022.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 2, 2023 at 7:31 am

      I don’t know. The Hasselblad folks were vague on that. I suspect not, or they would have told me to hold my optical testing, but I don’t really know.

      Reply
  2. Marcus says

    October 10, 2024 at 7:04 pm

    I wonder whether the new firmware made any difference to the shutter noise? What are your thoughts Jim?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.