• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / High shutter speed out of focus point spread functions with the XCD 90V

High shutter speed out of focus point spread functions with the XCD 90V

February 19, 2024 JimK 2 Comments

A reader asked me to test the high shutter speed bokeh of the Hasselblad XCD 90V on the X2D. I made the tests with my recently acquired production version of the lens. For a source, I used an LED flashlight with a 15 or 20 mm aperture at a distance of about 10 meters. That’s not quite a point source, but it’s the best I can do where I am. I set the lens wide open and focused at the minimum focusing distance.

Here’s a full frame shot:

1/4000

Here are some crops:

1/4000

 

1/2000

 

1/1000

 

1/500

 

As you can see, the bokeh is anything but the classical flat disk. You can see an image of the shutter blades that gradually fades as the shutter speed goes down. But what are those black worms? They don’t appear on normal shots with this lens and camera.  And they move with the flashlight, not appearing in the same place on the sensor.

Here’s another shot at 1/500, with the flashlight placed at a slightly different space in the frame:

Compare that to the shot above.

I’d appreciate any cogent thoughts on the source of the “worms”.

In the upper right corner:

1/4000

 

1/2000

 

1/1000

 

1/500

 

 

X2D

← The dubious search for GOATs More on high shutter speed bokeh with the X2D and the XCD 90V →

Comments

  1. Tony says

    February 20, 2024 at 8:20 am

    I’m going to guess that the worms are shadows of airborne particles of some kind. They are reminiscent of the perfectly sharp (except for diffraction) shadows of nearer pine needles when I have an image with bokeh balls of the Christmas tree lights on the far side of the tree. The dust motes themselves aren’t in focus; the worms are missing patches in the wavefront, like the animal shadows we made on walls in our childhoods.

    Reply
  2. CarVac says

    February 20, 2024 at 9:48 am

    It could be contamination inside the flashlight optics.

    Same principle as this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokode

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.