• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z8 / 105/2.8 Nikkor S on Nikon Z8, Siemens Star

105/2.8 Nikkor S on Nikon Z8, Siemens Star

May 7, 2024 JimK 2 Comments

I started testing my new 105mm f/2.8 Z-mount Nikkor S lens. I put it on a Z8 body, mounted it on a Edelkron tripod with a Arca Swiss C1 head, and aimed it at a store-bought Zeiss Siemens Star target about 20 feet away.

f/2.8, center, no falloff comp

I shot 6 images at base ISO and 1/400 second using AF-S with the smallest square with the star in the center, at the left edge, and in the upper left corner. I made my first run wide open. I took the sharpest of each of the six samples. Normally, I’d use manual focus for this, but the manual focusing with this lens is so twitchy that that was extremely frustrating.

300% magnification crops, first with no compensation for light falloff off axis.

f/2.8, center, no falloff comp

 

f/2.8, left edge, no falloff comp

 

f/2.8, upper left corner, no falloff comp

And here is a set with the light falloff compensated in Lightroom by eye.

f/2.8, center, no falloff comp

 

f/2.8, left edge, falloff comp

 

f/2.8, upper left corner, falloff comp

After I saw how good these were, I decided that testing at narrower apertures would be pointless. The lens is clearly laying down more detail than the sensor can resolve, all the way across the frame.

Bravo, Nikon!

 

Z8

← Artificial intelligence and camera firmware Backup, revisited →

Comments

  1. Pieter Kers says

    May 8, 2024 at 2:13 am

    I too have this lens and it is a gem. On a Z8 I do my manual focus with the focus ring (F9) on MAX and at view at400% – works really good. I find pinpoint AF-S the most accurate AF

    Reply
  2. Petr_FPL Odehnal says

    May 9, 2024 at 12:06 am

    Try repeating the same test with pixel shift modes.
    When I tested the Sony A7R3, the PS4 worked and increased the real resolution because it eliminated the “color guessing” in the demosaic process, but the PS16 didn’t provide any additional measurable increase in resolution.
    I was therefore very pleasantly surprised by how the Z8 handled the PS16:
    http://www.fpl.cz/tst/ps16_5012.jpg

    I hope to see pixel shift in some Z9 firmware upgrade soon!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.