• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — hard proofing

A book report — hard proofing

May 12, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book. The series starts here.

I previously reported on gang hard proofing. Yesterday, Jerry asked me for the final copies of each of the images for the book. I had previously identified seven images for which the standard Adobe gamut mapping with relative colorimetric intent were not acceptable. I turned on Lightroom’s soft proofing feature and set the output medium to Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004). I created virtual copies of the seven images. I made corrections with the adjustment brush, and exported the images to .psd files in ProPhoto RGB.

I opened the files in Photoshop, converted them to Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004), saved them as TIFFs, and proofed them on my Epson 4900 on Exhibition Fiber paper. I had previously determined that the entire Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004) gamut lies within the 4900/Exhibition Fiber gamut. I made sure that the Black Point Compensation box in the Ps print dialog was unchecked.

The prints looked good. Too good, in fact. I got suspicious. I measured some dark areas on the prints with a reflection densitometer, and got readings in the 1.8s. That seemed too high for offset lithography. I got a recent issue of LensWork, and measured the darkest spots I could find in the 4-color images: 1.66. Then I measured the darkest spots I could find in the duotone images: 1.76.

I created a PPRGB image in Ps, and filled it with 0/0/0. Then I converted it to Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004), and printed it with the Black Point Compensation checked and unchecked. With the box checked, I got readings of 2.10 with the densitometer. With the box not checked, I got 1.88.

So, it seems that the collective wisdom of the profile and the Adobe color management software is that the printer can print as dark as a density of 1.88. If that’s true, that’s wonderful.

As a side issue, things would be a lot easier if Lightroom supported CMYK files. I’m not sure why they don’t. The program knows enough about CMYK files in general, and Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004) in particular, to make soft proofing work. That means it can get from its internal color space to CMYK. Why can’t it get from CMYK to its internal color space?

Added 5/14:

Mystery solved.

I looked at the GRACoL 2006 gamut in Gamutvision:

gracol black point

The black point has an L* of 11.

I ran this little code snippet in Matlab:

gracol density

Photoshop/Adobe was right all along. Now to find out what I can really expect off the press.

The Last Word

← E-mount lens longevity A seven-shot focus shift test →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.