• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / Calibrating the D850 AF Adjust on a 105/1.4

Calibrating the D850 AF Adjust on a 105/1.4

January 13, 2018 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.  The series starts here. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”.

In this post, I developed a strategy for calibrating the Nikon D850 AF Adjustment with the Nikon 105 mm f1/4E lens so that the correction applied by the camera was approximately correct in the face of focus shift with aperture, of which the 105/1.4E has plenty.

In order to quickly dial the corrections implied by the scheme in the previous post to the camera, it would be extremely useful if the camera applied the same amount of image-field physical shift for every increment on the AF Adjust scale, which goes in integer steps from -20 to +20. It would also be useful to know what that increment is in micrometers.

I set up the D850 with the 105/1.4E and aimed it at a LensAlign target:

I made 10 PDAF exposures with the AF Adjust set to each of the following values: -20, -16, -12, -8, -4, 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. The first set was at f/1.4, and the second at f/4. In each case, I used 32 CDAF exposures for calibration. ISO was 64, shutter speed was 1/1000 for the f/1.4 pictures, and 1/250 for the f/4 ones. I used the Nikon remote that you can see above on the camera stand tray. I defocused with the ring before each of the PDAF shots, each time in the same direction.

The f/1.4 results:

 

The first graph shows just the Adobe RGB green channel, and the second shows all three. 40 units of AF Adjust produce about 160 um of shift, and the relationship is close to linear. So each unit of AF Adjust produces about 4 um of shift.

Does this change with aperture? That’s what the f/4 test was for.

 

Maybe there’s a little more shift, but I’m gonna go with 4 um per AF Adjust unit.

Does this change with focal length? Stay tuned.

D850

← PDAF tuning the Nikon 105/1.4E on the D850 Calculating the D850 FSS step size →

Comments

  1. Chris Livsey says

    January 14, 2018 at 5:09 am

    Looks like you answered the question you posed previously ( the cliff hanger):

    Is 10 micrometers (um) of shift a little or a lot?

    May be worth linking back/forward to that.

    Just to add, I wonder, as I’m sure you do, how reproducible that 4 um is and therefore how much it is adding to the point spread, too many variables you can’t fix I suppose?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.