• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Spotmetering for ETTR — testing

Spotmetering for ETTR — testing

December 8, 2012 JimK 2 Comments

In the preceding post and an earlier one, a reader proposed an ETTR technique that I will summarize in Zone System terminology: Place the brightest significant highlight on Zone VIII. A simple way to achieve this is to set the metering mode on a (Nikon — see the comment for Canon technique) DSLR to spot, set the exposure compensation to  +3 stops, set the exposure mode to manual, point the camera at the brightest significant highlight, adjust the aperture and shutter speed to null the meter, reframe the image, and press the shutter release.

No messing with histograms. No fiddling with the white balance. No looking at EXIF data. All good things. How well does it work?

The first test I gave the technique was this scene:

It’s a toughie for exposure. The dynamic range is great; you’re actually looking at an image constructed from five exposures a stop apart. The brightest spot in the image is in the upper part of the sky, which is well off center, so it will be darker than if it were in the center of the image (where the spotmeter reads) due to the falloff of the light from the 14mm f/2.8 Nikkor. Well, the stars all aligned, and the highlight on Zone VIII technique yielded the same exposure as the corrected in-camera histogram approach.

So I moved on to other subjects, still using the 14mm on the D4. Sometimes the two exposure techniques agreed. Other times, the spotmeter method told me to use a third of a stop or a half a stop more exposure than the in-camera histogram. The results in these cases were closer to the right hand side of the histogram than I usually like to see, but the highlights were not blown. You could argue that the spotmeter method produced more optimal exposures.

Here’s one such image:

Here’s the real raw histogram:

I moved on to the Leica M9, which has no spotmetering capability, so I had to make some adjustments. I used the D4 with a Zeiss 100mm lens as a spotmeter. I got inconsistent results; some good, some underexposures, and some with blown highlights. I think the combination of the tight spot on the D4 and the longish focal length probably gave me such a small light sensitive area that it really needed to be pointed at the exact right place.

My next test case was the Sony NEX-7 with the Zeiss 24mm lens. It was a total flop. The camera doesn’t let you apply exposure compensation in manual mode, choosing instead to show you how far over or underexposed you are. Not a bad plan, right? Maybe for most purposes, but the range of the under/over exposure indicator is plus or minus two stops, and I needed at least three to make the spotmeter-the-highlight trick work.  Could I set the camera to aperture-preferred, set the exposure compensation to plus three stops, meter the highlight, press the exposure lock button, recompose, and trip the shutter? I could indeed, but all the while I was doing this dance, the histogram in the lower right corner of the viewfinder was mocking me, asking me why I was putting myself through contortions when all I had to do was look at it. The pictures confirmed that spotmetering works as well as on the D4, but it’s way more trouble than it’s worth on the NEX-7.

I tried an infra-red modified D3x, and, as expected, the spotmeter technique produced horribly underexposed images. The meter, being in the finder, has no idea that the sensor has been modified.

My conclusions? If you’ve got a conventional DSLR, and find the “shoot, look at the histogram, correct exposure, and shoot again” approach irksome, using the built-in spotmeter and putting the bright highlight on Zone VIII is a fine alternative for ETTR. If your camera doesn’t have a spotmeter mode, like the M9, don’t run out and buy a spotmeter; correct the white balance and use the histogram. If you’re using a camera with an electronic viewfinder that shows you a live histogram, correct the white balance, look at the histogram, and you won’t have to make any trial exposures.

Thanks to my correspondent for bringing this technique to my attention. I’m sure there will be times when I’ll use it.

The Last Word

← ETTR by spot metering, part 2 Testing for ETTR, part 9 →

Comments

  1. Jim says

    December 8, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    My correspondent says:

    “Minor tweak for the Canon people. Canon’s engineers, in their wisdom, do not allow EC adjustment in Manual mode. So, “nulling” it, is adjusting meter to +3….or whatever your testing determined to be correct. Luckily the newer cameras do have +/-3 in the viewfinder meter.”

    Reply
  2. Richard says

    December 31, 2018 at 8:59 am

    Eureka!!!! This is an amazingly simple solution to a problem that has long vexed the photography world.
    If everyone applied this technique, it would stop forever the endless internet feuds over how to properly expose a camera.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.