• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / a7RIII exposure strategy — manual settings

a7RIII exposure strategy — manual settings

July 25, 2018 JimK 13 Comments

This is one of a series of posts on the Sony a7RIII.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7RIII”.

A few days ago, I performed a quantitative analysis of the a7RIII noise performance versus ISO setting. Then I made a series of posts showing visually what’s going on with the camera in that regard. The first of those is here.

Some conclusions:

  • The camera is close to ISOless from 100 to 500, and even closer from 640 on up.
  • There is a substantial improvement in input-referred read noise when you go from ISO 500 to ISO 640, but that improvement is material only in the deepest shadows.

So, assuming that you are setting your f-stops, shutter speeds, and ISO settings manually, what is the best strategy?

If you can, expose to the right (ETTR) at base ISO. This is a no-brainer and is true for just about any digital camera. What keeps it from working all the time?

  • You can’t tell from the in-camera histogram whether the raw file is saturating. UniWB helps, but most people don’t want to go to all that trouble and look at green preview images, and even UniWB is not a panacea.
  • You may need more light on the sensor. Depth of field (DOF) requirements and dealing with camera motion and subject motion often conspire to make the ideal exposure impractical.

So now what, assuming that you’re shooting RAW?

  1. Decide on the f-stop you need based on DOF, not the light.
  2. Decide on the shutter speed you need based on motion blur, not the light.
  3. Then set the ISO; deciding that gets a bit more complicated.

The first thing to do is figure out the ISO that would place the significant highlights on the right side of the histogram; let’s call that the metered ISO. ) I want to reserve ETTR for base ISO exposures, and we’ve already decided that this scene won’t let us do ETTR at base ISO.)

  1. If that ISO is 100 or as much as one stop over, set the ISO to 100 and make the exposure. If that ISO is 640 or as much as three stops over, set the ISO to 640 and make the exposure. You’ll get more highlight protection, and it won’t cost you anything significant in shadow noise.
  2. If that ISO is between 250 and 400, decide if you need the last bit of shadow signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). If you don’t, set the ISO to 250, take the shot, and get some extra highlight protection.
  3. If that ISO is 500, decide if you could do with bit less highlight protection. If not, set the ISO to 500. If yes, set it to 640 and enjoy lower super-deep-shadow SNR.
  4. If that ISO is between 640 and 4000, and you think you’ve got the highlights handled, set the ISO to 640, and use that exposure. This will produce images that are, by conventional metering standards, more and more “underexposured” as the metered ISO rises.
  5. If that ISO is over 4000, set the ISO setting to three stops under the metered ISO. Three stops of extra highlight protection should be enough for almost any scene, and pushing too much in postproduction can cause some color shifts.

That sounds complicated, but once you’ve gone through the steps a few times, you can figure out the camera settings you need instantly.

Let’s work through a few examples.

From the LV or sample histogram, you decide that that sunset-with-foreground you’re shooting needs f/11, and the wind means you need 1/250. But the histogram tells you that, in order to get a right-populated histogram you need ISO 400. The picture is all about the highlights. Shoot with the ISO dial set to 100, so you’ll get plenty of protection.

You’re shooting the Milky Way, and with the lens set wide open at f/2.8 and a 15-second exposure, which is all you can manage before the stars start to blur, the ISO setting for a right-loaded histogram would be 5000. But the stars are tiny, and the histogram might not be finding the brightest ones, or they might not make a big enough bump to see. Set the ISO to 640.

Now let’s move on to a slightly different situation, one in which you are not trying to get the settings for a single exposure or a set of exposures of the same subject in the same light, but a situation in which you want camera settings that will work over a modest range of lighting and camera angle changes. This is a situation in which your first instinct might be to use one of the a7RIII’s automatic exposure modes. However, you will see that there can be advantages to setting the camera’s exposure manually.

For your anticipated typical shot, use the techniques above to decide your settings. Then decide how much the scene and lighting is likely to change, and in what direction. If you think it will get brighter, bias the settings you came up with for highlight protection. If darker conditions are more likely, make the bias in favor of shadow SNR. The advantages of this approach over A, S, or P modes are:

  1. You get the shutter speed you need to deal with the motion, and no faster.
  2. You get the aperture you need to deal with DOF, and no narrower.
  3. You don’t have to try to figure out what the heck the metering system is doing to your exposures.
  4. You’ve got an ISO setting that does what you want it to do, even as conditions change.

This way of exposing is quite different than the way that most folks use, and is fluid and freeing in practice, removing worries about exposure and producing optimal files.

a7RIII

← a7RIII shadow noise — ISOs 500 & 640, 4 stop push a7RIII exposure strategy — auto-exposure settings →

Comments

  1. David Panno says

    August 9, 2018 at 5:25 pm

    Jim – shouldn’t 4. above read “If that ISO is over a thousand”?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 9, 2018 at 5:59 pm

      You caught me, but you didn’t go far enough. ISO 5000 is three stops over ISO 500. I will need to add something for the case between 640 and 4000.

      Reply
      • David F Panno says

        August 10, 2018 at 3:50 am

        Wouldn’t all metered ISO over 640 be 640?

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 10, 2018 at 9:22 am

          In the most extreme application of the theory, yes. I’ve rewritten the post to make what I was trying to say more clear. Let me know if I’ve got it now. Thanks for your help debugging this post.

          Reply
  2. David Panno says

    August 10, 2018 at 1:33 pm

    Your welcome Jim; thanks for posting it.

    Also – in 2. above – should it read “if you DON’T” ?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 10, 2018 at 1:35 pm

      Yes, it should. And It does — now. Thanks!

      Reply
  3. Nik says

    August 20, 2018 at 11:32 pm

    Very interesting.

    My case: I have to shoot a landscape at night (foreground for a milky way sky I shoot separate). Pitch dark, not too worried about highlights, but I need to capture max shadow details and not destroy the image with too much recover in post.

    F-stop of 5.6/6.3. Shutter speed 30″ . Metered ISO 6400 for a good balanced histogram.

    1) I set ISO to 800 ( three stops below) and I recover 3 stops in pp- same noise as 6400 but slightly better SNR? But I don’t care about highlights, does it still make sense?

    2) I set ISO to 800 and crank shutter speed to 4 min (three stops). Assuming I have no problems with wind. This gives me the same exposure as the two cases above and according to my test I get much better and cleaner shadow details and less noise. Of course I have to deal with 4min shutter speed which could be not practical in most of cases.

    Comments?

    Thanks!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 21, 2018 at 7:39 am

      When the highlights don’t clip and you don’t have motion issues, more exposure is always better than less.

      Reply
      • Nik says

        August 21, 2018 at 9:43 am

        Indeed, but what if I have motion issues?
        Keep 6400 or step down to 800 (still no worries to clip highlights)?

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 21, 2018 at 9:58 am

          If the scene is flat enough, it doesn’t matter, assuming the exposure is the same.

          Reply
  4. Wendell McBride says

    June 5, 2019 at 4:45 pm

    On your manual strategy, items 2 and 3 above, what if you are shooting a static scene in bright moonlight therefore your shutter speed can be fast or slow since nothing is moving. In this case, a faster shutter and higher ISO will certainly introduce noise. If however I choose ISO 100-500 as decision 2, then shutter speed as decision 3, will I get an image with less noise? I believe the answer is yes in which case steps 2 and 3 could be reversed. I can certainly use photo stacking to address the noise in post, but better to pick an exposure methodology that gets me the best result possible before post. Is there any limitation to this strategy so long as there is no movement in the frame over the exposure period? Considering that the best overall performance of the sensor is always at ISO 100, would I choose that and then make the decision on exposure time? Thanks in advance.

    Reply
  5. derek says

    October 27, 2019 at 12:14 am

    This is very helpful. Where can I find picture and setting with before pp and after pp?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 27, 2019 at 6:28 am

      I haven’t posted “before” pix. Many of the interesting ones would be so dark as to be useless. If you want to see some settings and “after” pictures (though with the a7RIV), here are some:

      https://blog.kasson.com/a7riv/high-dr-photography-with-the-sony-a7riv/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.