• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-S and focus shift

D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-S and focus shift

January 25, 2018 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”. This is equally a post about the Sony a7RIII, and is also tagged as such.

I spent all day yesterday refining my focus plane testing. I’ve gone to a low-contrast matte checkerboard on the ramp to make lighting less critical. It works fine with the LensAlign Pro ramp angle set to 4, but not at the lower settings, which would be desirable, for reducing the way that field curvature can look like focus shift on this test. That’s a theoretical problem, but I would like to have a long ramp that takes up less of the image height. It’s very easy to align the focusing board of LensAlign Pro; the built-in alignment aids are well thought out, and work well. However, it’s taken me a while to figure out which of the aids works best. I’ve finally settled on the one on the lower right of the target; it’s closest to the center of the ramp. I’m now lining that up and, for autofocus testing, moving the focusing point up an to the left so that it covers the target. 

I’ve experimented with leaving the lens axis on the alignment point and with moving the camera to the right after alignment so that the lens axis is parallel to the aligned position, but centered on the middle of the ramp. You’d need a focusing rail mounted sideways to make that shift with the camera mounted on a tripod, but with a camera stand, it’s easy and no additional gear is required. Turns out that it doesn’t make much difference. Here’s what the focus shift of the Sony Zeiss 55 mm f/1.8 (Zony 55) looks like: 

I’ve plotted the three Adobe RGB color channels. The graph presents displacement of the image projected on the sensor from the desired green-channel focal plane. Negative numbers indicate front-focusing. The image-plane shift is in micrometers (um).  The blue focus locations are separated from the red and green ones because of the longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) of the lens. The dots indicate the results for each of the ten exposures at each f-stop. I’ve made lines indicating the average (aka mean or mu) of the sample set bolder and added thin lines above and below the means that are one standard deviation (sigma) away from it. In this case, the spread is so tight that it’s hard to see the individual lines. 

Here’s one thing that the last few days of testing have really driven home to me: focus shift varies with distance. The above test was done with a target distance of 1.2 meters. A few days ago, I tested the very same lens at somewhat further away, and the focus shift was in the opposite direction. There’s another thing that’s strange about the plot above: LoCA varies with f-stop. In fact, the blue plane is focused behind the green plane when the lens is wide open, and in front of it as it is stopped down. The red plane gets closer to the other two as the lens is stopped down. 

Here’s what the plot above look like in terms of the circles of confusion implied by the focus shift defocusing:

 

 

Let’s ignore the red and blue planes and look only at the green, which is where most of the luminance signal is. At worst, the focus shift is making the COC diameter well under the pixel pitch. 

Now we’ll look at the focus shift of the Nikon 58 mm f/1.4 lens on the D850:

It is far more severe than the Zony 55’s shift.

Looking at the CoCs:

This is a lens that needs to be focused at the taking aperture until at least f/4, where it can be focused there.

Now we’ll look at both lenses using AF-S. The Nikon is using the finder-based PDAF, and the Sony is doing whatever-the-heck-it-does with a combination of PDAF and CDAF. I used the electronic shutter for the Sony and EFCS for the Nikon. There was +14 AF Adjust dialed into the D850 to get the average focal plane right wide open.

 

 

Here are the CoCs:

 

 

Plotting the shift and the resulting CoCs on the same graph, with the D850 lines dotted:

 

 

 

Just like the long zooms tested a few days ago, there’s more variability with the D850. If we just concentrate on the green channels, the Sony CoCs are within 3 pixel pitches from mean-minus-sigma to mean-plus-sigma.

 

Next up: AF-C.

 

a7RIII, D850

← MB-D18 grip, BL-5 on D850 D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-C →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    January 25, 2018 at 4:47 pm

    If the LoCA varies with f-stop, then isn’t that spherochromatism, where the spherical aberration changes with wavelength?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.