the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-C

D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-C

January 25, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”. This is equally a post about the Sony a7RIII, and is also tagged as such.

In the previous post, I compared the focus errors of the autofocusing systems of the D850 and a7RIII in AF-S mode, with a 55 mm f/1.8 on the Sony and a 55 mm f/1.4 on the Nikon. The Sony showed less focus shift and less variability. Now I’m going to look at AF-C performance. As before, I’m using the finder-based PDAF on the D850 and the sensor-based hybrid PDAF/CDAF on the a7RIII. I used EFCS with the D850 and electronic shutter with the a7RIII. The Nikon has the compromise AF Adjust of +5; AF adjustment is not possible on the Sony. The Sony AF tracking is set to Standard, and the spot size to medium.

 

I’ve plotted the three Adobe RGB color channels. The graph presents displacement of the image projected on the sensor from the desired green-channel focal plane. Negative numbers indicate front-focusing. The image-plane shift is in micrometers (um).  The blue focus locations are separated from the red and green ones because of the longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) of the lens. The dots indicate the results for each of the ten exposures at each f-stop. I’ve made lines indicating the average (aka mean or mu) of the sample set bolder and added thin lines above and below the means that are one standard deviation (sigma) away from it. 

The Nikon has about the same amount of focal plane variability in AF-C as it did in AF-S. The Sony has more variability than it did in AF-S, but there’s something odd. There is a lot of variability near wide open, then things tighten up between f/2.5 and /4.5, then loosen again after that. In fact, probably since the a7RIII is focusing stopped-down in AF-C mode, at f/8 it has substantially more variability than the D850.  It’s looking like the a7RIII has several focusing strategies, and employs different ones at different f-stops.

When we looked in the previous post at the D850 using AF-S with a +5 AF Adjust, it front-focused at wide apertures. Now it’s back-focusing by about the same amount. I consider it fairly distressing that the right AF-Adjust value depends on the AF mode.

Now we’ll look at the circles of confusion (CoCs) implied by the amount of defocusing we see above:

 

 

There’s only a narrow band of f-stops where the a7RIII has lower variability, and it’s substatially worse near f/8, and presumably beyond.

Let’s see the Nikon with the right amount of AF Adjustment for wide open:

 

 

 

 

With the AF adjustment properly set, the Nikon green-channel CoCs are staying within about 6 pixel-spacings. The Sony’s are within 3 most of the time and don’t get much beyond 4 even if you look at the one-sigma errors.

All of the above plots are for the first shot in a sequence. Since the Sony has an electronic shutter that can be used while the camera is handheld, I thought it would be interesting to look at what happens if you make 15-shot bursts.

 

 

The errors are somewhat worse at narrow apertures. 

 

The Last Word

← D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF-S and focus shift D850 58/1.4 vs a7RIII 55/1.8 AF w/ face & eye detection →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2022
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on D850 exposure strategy — manual settings
  • Alex Ramsay on D850 exposure strategy — manual settings
  • Michael Klein on Moving away from Sony cameras
  • JimK on Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram
  • JimK on Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram
  • Srdjan on Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram
  • JimK on Leica Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 50S — Siemens star
  • JimK on Leica Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 50S — Siemens star
  • James Sullivan on Leica Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 50S — Siemens star
  • Luís Filipe da Cunha on Subscribe to comments — going once…

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.