• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / Nikon D850 read noise vs shutter speed

Nikon D850 read noise vs shutter speed

October 31, 2017 JimK 7 Comments

This is the fifth post in a series of Nikon D850 tests. The series starts here.

I made a series of dark-field exposures at ISO 1000 at all the timed shutter speeds that the D850 supports, with LENR off. I measured the rms read noise in counts (data numbers, if you prefer) in a 400×400 pixel central square. The result looks like this:

Between 1/4 and 1/5 second, the read noise drops. That usually indicates raw cooking. I looked at the frequency characteristics of the raw noise over the whole frame of the 1/4 second and 1/5 second images.

 

Both of those look white, so whatever Nikon is doing, it’s not low-pass filtering.

Let’s check 30 seconds just to make sure.

No filtering there, either.

Now let’s look at the full frame histograms of the 1/5 second and 1/4 second images:

 

 

There is a little shift in the mean values, but nothing stands out.

I’m not sure what Nikon is doing at 1/4 second and slower to reduce noise.

D850

← Nikon D850, Sony a7RIII design goals Magical thinking and ISO choice →

Comments

  1. Ilias says

    November 1, 2017 at 1:37 am

    Jim, thanks 🙂

    I think that histograms in log scale (vertically) would be more informative .. we could see if outliers are cut-off @1/4sec shots ..

    BTW .. have you checked where the vertical seam lies in your D850’s sensor ?. It’s easy to detect it on an overexposed shot and applying extreme contrast curve. Maybe you should not use exactly the central area for measures ..
    Maybe this is the reason for the histograms having a slight skew to the left (longrer tails at the right)

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 1, 2017 at 9:02 am

      Thanks for the idea about log scale. These histograms are full-frame; I’ll edit the post to make that clear. I’ll take your advice next time I do a sampled measurement.

      Reply
  2. Ilias says

    November 1, 2017 at 1:56 am

    See the abnormal central verical zone ..

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0NqktTgc54sVy1DNVl1UVllLVE/view?usp=sharing

    Reply
  3. AndrewZ says

    November 2, 2017 at 6:09 am

    Horizontal looks almost as if its shifted up on axis. The sigma look less so I think there is definitely something going on.

    Reply
  4. Bernard Delley says

    November 4, 2017 at 12:57 am

    Nikon traditionally kicks in its hot pixel suppression scheme at 1/4s and longer exposures.
    https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/56901347
    So far, I could not figure out Nikons’s HPS algorithm for cameras D7200 and newer. But, your detailed analysis here may have given me a hint for a new go at this.

    Reply
  5. Ilias Giarimis says

    December 2, 2017 at 9:27 am

    Jim, do you have any long exposures at very high ISOs
    http://blog.kasson.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/iso-25600-1024×838.png

    If Nikon does something after digitization then we should see some gaps filling .. and so intendify most of the interpolated/altered pixels ..

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 2, 2017 at 9:34 am

      I’ll look at that when I get a chance, but right now I’m up to my ears in a7RIII testing, which has some urgency since it just started shipping.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.