• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / Sigma 85/1.4 on D850: CDAF, PDAF, focus shift

Sigma 85/1.4 on D850: CDAF, PDAF, focus shift

January 7, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.  The series starts here. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”.

In a previous post, I reported on my progress in developing a software tool to process image sets made of a LensAlign target to produce the sort of results that FocusTune does: focus distance versus AF Adjust setting. Yesterday, I applied that technique to the Nikon 105/1.4 on a D850, with a subject distance of ten feet. Today, I’ll do the same thing with the excellent Sigma 85 mm f/1.4 Art lens.

I set the target distance to 8.5 feet. I focussed manually at the beginning of the series, and making 10 images at the one-third f-stops from f/1.4 through f/4, when I got bored and switched to whole-stop intervals for f/5.6 and f/8. Here’s the result for the AdobeRGB green channel:

All image points are plotted, 10 for each f-stop. Back-focusing is indicated by positive y-axis numbers and front-focusing by negative ones. I focused the first image with CDAF wide open, and got a small amount of front focusing, but I’m not totally confident in the location of the target plane right now, so don’t put much stock in that. The green line is the average for each stop, but I screwed up and only calculated it for the whole stops. As you can see, the spread in the data for each stop is quite small, and we don’t really need the average line. The forward movement in the subject focal plane at f/8 may be an error; the technique that I’m using becomes less accurate as the DOF increases.

You can also see about 2 cm of focus shift as the lens is stopped down, which I’ve observed using other analysis methods. By f/2.8, the shift has virtually ceased.

All three AdobeRGB channels:

The red channel is back-focused with respect to the green channels, and the blue is even further back-focussed. This is a consequence of the 85/1.4’s longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA).

When I use the D850’s contrast-detection autofocus (CDAF) on every shot in a similar series (but with all whole-stop spacing), here is what the green channel data looks like:

CDAF shows some shift as the f-stops change. The green unfilled circles have diameter proportional to the standard deviation of the data set at each stop. 

All channels:

Using PDAF:

The shift in subject focal plane is far more pronounced. The spread is greater, too, but that it somewhat masked by the different vertical scales

All channels:

Here’s one more lens for which you need to decide what f-stop is most important to you, and use that f-stop when you collect tuning images.

 

D850

← Nikon 105/1.4 on D850: CDAF, PDAF, focus shift Sigma 135/1.8 on D850: CDAF, PDAF, focus shift →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.