• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100S / Eyeballing some expressive color processing, part 3

Eyeballing some expressive color processing, part 3

July 29, 2021 JimK Leave a Comment

In the previous post, I showed you some applications of different color profiles and presets to an image that I made. I’m going to do the same kind of thing, but to a raw file that is readily available. It’s a DPR Gallery shot, and you can find it here. I applied various profiles and presets, and white balanced to the shadow behind the girl’s head afterwards. There is one shot that came from a DPR member, who downloaded the DPR raw, and applied the ColorFidelity GFX100 V2 Standard profile.

Adobe Color

 

Cobalt Standard

 

ColorFidelity GFX100 V2 Standard

 

Color Fidelity GFX 100S Portrait V3

 

Color Fidelity GFX 100S Standard V3

 

Color Fidelity GFX 100S Medium V3

 

Color Fidelity GFX 100S Neutral V3

 

Adobe Portrait

 

Adobe/Fuji Astia Soft

 

Adobe/Fuji Nostalgic Neg

 

Adobe/Fuji Pro Neg

 

Cobalt Kodak Portra 160 Standard Curve

 

Cobalt Kodachrome Last Roll Dark Flat Curve

 

Cobalt Pro 400 Standard Curve

 

Cobalt Kodachrome 4×5 Bright Standard Curve

 

Mastin 400H

 

Mastin 160NS

 

And here are a couple I’m not fond of at all.

Cobalt Kodak Ektar 100 Standard Curve

 

Cobalt Fuji Provia 400x Standard Curve

 

 

 

GFX 100S

← Eyeballing some expressive color processing, part 2 GFX 100S DR setting affects raw files →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.