• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100S / Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — sharpness, shift vs postproduction

Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — sharpness, shift vs postproduction

November 19, 2024 JimK 5 Comments

Lensrentals has loaned me a Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 GF tilt/shift lens. I’m getting ready to send it back, and I asked on DPR if there were any tests that anybody wanted me to run. One reader asked that I compare the sharpness of shifted images vs ones that applied the same sort of corrections in postproduction.

The results will of course depend on where in the image you look. I put the target in about the center of the image.

f/5.6 with shift

 

F/5.6 with yaw

Some crops at about 150% magnification:

f/5.6 with shift

 

 

F/5.6 with yaw

 

f/5.6 with yaw, corrected in Ps

 

f/8 with shift

 

f/8 with yaw

 

f/8 with yaw, corrected in Ps.

At f/5.6, the shifted image is less sharp than the Photoshop corrected image. At f/8, they’re about the same.

GFX 100S

← Fujifilm 30mm f/5.6 T/S lens — medium distance field curvature On shift, pitch, yaw, and sharpness →

Comments

  1. Oleksii says

    November 19, 2024 at 10:32 pm

    I’m curious, does Fuji write shift amount to the exif?

    Reply
    • Markus says

      November 21, 2024 at 12:02 pm

      yes, it does

      Reply
    • JimK says

      November 21, 2024 at 1:02 pm

      Indeed it does:

      https://www.captureintegration.com/additional-lens-metadata-for-fujifilm-gf-30mm-110mm-t-s-lenses/

      Reply
      • Oleksii says

        November 21, 2024 at 10:57 pm

        Maybe you have a raw of shifted shot that you can share? Preferably a flat field shot, but any file would be enough. I wrote small utility for the flat field correction, and want to add shift to matcher. Thank you

        Reply
  2. Paul R says

    December 13, 2024 at 10:47 am

    For the kind of work likely done with this lens, would it make sense to compare the shifted image to a post-production corrected one made with a wider lens, so after cropping you get an equivalent image?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.