• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Leica Q2 Monochrom / Can you do IR with an unmodified Leica Q2 Monochrom?

Can you do IR with an unmodified Leica Q2 Monochrom?

June 7, 2022 JimK 2 Comments

This is the 19th post in a series about the Leica Q2 Monochrom. You can see all the other posts in the series by looking in the Category List drop-down menu on the right side of the page.

With the Q2 Monochrom, Leica doesn’t have to worry about bad color. So I thought maybe they’d not have such an aggressive hot mirror as most cameras. I got a 49mm R72 (720nm IR passing) filter, and put it on the camera. With the lens wide open at 30 seconds exposure and ISO 12500, the finder was completely black when I aimed the camera at sunlit foliage.

So I guess the answer is no, you can’t do IR with an unmodified Q2 Monochrom. Maybe Leica has an aggressive hot mirror to make the job the lens has to do easier. Maybe you could get something to register if you used exposures of several minutes.

 

Leica Q2 Monochrom

← Leica Q2 Q&A Effect of camera resolution on small prints →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    June 8, 2022 at 4:03 am

    There is black and white and then there is black and white. How to define it?

    Let’s say B&W is luminance, the achromatic signal in the second stage of the HVS. Then in daylight we would want aggregate spectral filtering over the sensor that approximates the photopic Luminous Efficiency Function. It would probably work in the dark just as well because we typically look at rendered captures in photopic conditions.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 8, 2022 at 12:17 pm

      I agree that the photopic spectral curve is probably a good place to start for a monochromatic sensor intended to be used without a filter. However, film did not faithfully adhere to that standard. Even film identified as panchromatic did not. I remember people selling filters that you’d screw onto the front of your spotmeter to make the meter’s spectral response closer to that of Tri-X.

      And, of course, there is a long tradition of modifying the spectral sensitivity curves of B&W film with filters. In fact, I think in the film era, I made many more B&W landscapes with filters than without filters.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.