• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Dr. Pratt’s developer

Dr. Pratt’s developer

November 8, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

In a previous post – you can see it here – I mentioned Dr. Pratt’s developer in passing. A web search for it yields no results. I’d like to give the formula and instructions for its use here, so that it becomes part of the collective cyber-consciousness.

Dr. Pratt’s developer is a two-solution paper developer used to achieve different contrast levels with non-variable contrast papers. I got this information from Pirkle Jones in 1988.

The first solution, called Part A, or the soft solution, is made by mixing together the following:

  • Water – 3 L
  • Metol – 50 g
  • Sodium sulfite – 180 g
  • Sodium carbonate – 120 g
  • Potassium bromide – 7 1/2 g

After you mix everything up, add water to make 4 liters.

The second solution, called Part B, or the contrasty solution, is made by mixing together the following:

  • Water – 3 L
  • Hydroquinone – 50 g
  • Sodium sulfite – 180 g
  • Sodium carbonate – 330 g
  • Potassium bromide – 30 g

After you mix everything up, add water to make 4 liters.

Starting with number two paper, here are the mixtures to get approximate paper grades between one and four:

  • 1 – 8 parts A, no B, 8 parts water
  • 1 1/2 – 7 parts A, 1 part B, 8 parts water
  • 2 – 6 parts A, 2 parts B, 8 parts water
  • 2 1/2 – 5 parts A, 3 parts B, 8 parts water
  • 3 – 4 parts A, 4 parts B, 8 parts water
  • 3 1/2 – 3 parts A, 5 parts B, 8 parts water
  • 4 – 2 parts A, 14 parts B, no water

 

 

Technical, The Last Word

← Upgrading to iOS 5 on an iPad Is digital photography a left brain pursuit? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.