• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Getting more RAM, part 3

Getting more RAM, part 3

March 4, 2011 JimK 4 Comments

With the Lenovo D20 looking like it could be too loud, I reduced the list of possibilities to the hp Z800 and the Dell T7500.

The hp workstation wins the design competition: nearly everything snaps together and requires no tools to access – it’s actually a step ahead of the Mac Pro, and the Mac is great in that regard. The T7500 uses more ordinary components, with a lot of wires visible when you pull the cover, but the interior is nicely laid out, and, because the case is so big, it’s not at all cramped inside.

The Z800 is quieter than the T7500 by about six db, a not-inconsiderable amount. A word on how to interpret decibel comparisons. To my ears, half a db is just detectable when one click of a volume control gives you that much change. One click of the volume control in a car usually produces a one or two db change. Doubling the power produces a three db increase, but it doesn’t sound twice as loud. People say that it takes a ten db change to make something sound twice as loud, but to my ears, a six db increment sounds about twice as loud.

I couldn’t configure a Z800 the way I wanted to on the web, so I called the 800 number and talked to a salesman.  He was pretty flexible on price, so I began to reconsider my plan to order a minimally configured machine and upgrade it myself (except for the spinning disks; neither Dell, nor hp, nor Lenovo, nor Apple have 3 TB disks available now, and they all take a staggering markup on the 2 TB ones). The largest hp solid-state disk was 160 GB, which to my way of thinking is too small for the OS and all the high=performance apps. I asked them to configure the machine with two 160 GB SSDs in striped (RAID 0) configuration. That sounded pretty good to me; I was looking for speed, and striping would give me even more.

Since the Z800, like the 7500, is available with either SATA or serial-attached SCSI (SAS) disks, I needed a way to get the other two drive bays wired for SATA (the downside of no visible wires is that all the wires are hidden, and therefore not so easy to change). You can’t just tell hp to wire it that way. So I asked them to install two of the cheapest SATA drives they had in the formerly empty bays, figuring that I could pull them and replace them with 3 TB Hitachi drives when I got the computer. There was a problem with the RAID. Since I had asked for a striped configuration for the first two drives, they were going to have to include the second two drives in the RAID 0 array, and the drives weren’t identical. I said, “Fine, configure all for as individual drives (JBOD, for Just a Bunch Of Disks is the acronym), and I’ll set up the striping myself.” Doable, but a hassle, especially since I’d have to reinstall the OS after setting up the RAID 0 arrray.

The last hangup was the RAM. The Z800 had six DIMM slots in a single-processor configuration. Hewlett-Packard sells 8 GB 1333 MHz ECC RDIMMs. But they won’t stick those very same DIMMs in the sockets on the motherboard when they build the system. I felt like imitating Jack Nicholson in the last scene of Five Easy Pieces, but I controlled myself, meekly suggesting that they build and test the machine with 3 each 1 GB DIMMs, and ship me the other 48 GB of RAM in a bag.

Hewlett-Packard went off to do a quote. It was well under list, but still quite a bit more expensive than doing the RAM upgrade myself.

Not being able to make their web configurator give me what I wanted either, I called Dell. They have a 256 GB SSD, so I only needed one. I’ve run into problems in the past with Dell blocking access to unused drive bays with bundles of heavily tie-wrapped wires, so I ordered three cheap SATA drives as placeholders. The 48 GB in 6 DIMMs was no problem. Dell’s pricing was a lot better than hp’s, but I still was considering a minimal machine and upgrading myself. Then I got a call from the Dell Premier people saying that they had even better pricing for me. That brought the system down to only a bit over what I could build it for.  When I considered what my time is worth, plus the avoidance of the hassle of returning the machine to a factory configuration if I had to be serviced, the choice was pretty clear: let Dell build the whole thing, except for the 3 TB disks.

So it boiled down to a better (easier to work on, quieter) machine from hp that would take a lot of my time to make right, or a more ordinary one from Dell that (except for the disks) would work the way I wanted out of the box. I went with Dell.

Technical, The Bleeding Edge

← Computer sound levels On-site service →

Comments

  1. chester says

    March 9, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    If noise was not an issue with the Lenovo, are there any noteworthy positives about the machine that makes it attractive over Dell & HP?

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    March 9, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    Chester, I didn’t explore it enough to really tell, but the construction is more like the Dell, not snap-together like the hp. There seemed to be a lot of options. The powerful version of the Lenovo is not as physically imposing as the equivalent Dell. If you’re considering the Dell, and the noise is not a problem for you (it’s not really very noisy, even if it’s as bad as the specs), I’d go through the process of configuring both with salespersons. The web configurators are great for ordinary PCs, but they don’t work so well on something this complicated. Remember also that these vendors have a lot of flexibility on price on these big computers.

    Jim

    Reply
  3. Fred says

    April 8, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    Were you concerned by the lack of TRIM on a RAID 0 array?

    Reply
  4. Jim says

    April 9, 2011 at 8:08 am

    Fred,

    You raise a good point, although I didn’t consider it at the time. It’s now moot, since I went with the Dell and the single, larger SSD.

    Jim

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.