• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Resampling for printing — Workflow

Resampling for printing — Workflow

June 23, 2011 JimK 2 Comments

The ideal resampling workflow for me would be as follows:

  1. I select the images I want to print
  2. I click the tab for the “the Print” module in Lightroom
  3. I pick the print size, the printer, and the output resolution.
  4. Lightroom analyzes the image, and presents me with a menu of resampling algorithms, some of them internal, and some of them third-party programs that are made to work with Lightroom. From its analysis of the image, Lightroom recommends one of the resampling algorithms.
  5. I accept Lightroom’s choice of resampling algorithm override that choice by picking from the list.
  6. When I press “Print One”, Lightroom invokes the chosen resampling algorithm before it sends the image to the printer, then erases the temporary file.

Unfortunately, that workflow is not available. I can have a workflow that works pretty much the same way if I’m willing to accept Lightroom’s not-very-good printer resampling algorithm. If that’s not okay, I can do one of the following:

  • Export the image from Lightroom for editing in Photoshop or another image editor, either with an explicit export or by using the “Edit in [your favorite image editor goes here]”. Once I’m in the image editor, I can use Perfect Resize, or one of the bicubic resampling algorithms that are native to Photoshop. When I close the image editor, Lightroom will automatically import the image, and I can print it from Lightroom. Then I have to go back and delete the resampled image.
  • Export the image from Lightroom directly to Perfect Resize, then proceed as above.
  • [This bullet is wrong; see the comments to this post and the next post] Export the image from Lightroom to Photoshop or some other image editor. Once in the image editor, change the color space to the printer color space, and save the file. Open Qimage, configure the printer driver, picked the resampling algorithm, and let Qimage send the file to the printer. Don’t forget to go back and delete the file with the image in the printer color space. All of the color space machinations are due to the fact that Qimage won’t do its own color space transformations, and requires that they be done in the printer driver. The Epson printer driver does not do a good job with color space transformations, and makes it hard (maybe impossible) to use your own profiles.

All the extra steps take some of the fun out of printing. If anybody has suggestions for more efficient workflows that still allow nearly-optimal resampling, please let me know.

 

Technical, The Bleeding Edge

← Resampling for printing, revisited, 5 Qimage color management →

Comments

  1. John says

    June 23, 2011 at 7:21 pm

    I think you need to learn Qimage better.

    Qimage has been doing color transformations since it’s inception. It remembers the printer, paper, icc, plus other settings so you can just select what you want.

    Workflow from LR is to simply export the file (to ensure all LR adjustments are applied). Then go to Qimage. Select the print setup….including how large you want to print it….and print….all resizing and smart sharpening are automatically applied.

    I suggest a little more time with some of the video tutorials or asking info on the forum before you just shoot off….with incorrect info.

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    June 24, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Grammar, hostility, and Qimage’s poor support of Lab color aside, John is right. Mea Culpa.

    Jim

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.