• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technology Hall of Shame / THoS: gratuitous daylight savings time changes

THoS: gratuitous daylight savings time changes

March 13, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

Prefatory note number one: this post, unlike most of the Technology Hall of Shame series, is not about the infliction of pain and suffering by technologists, but rather about aggravation caused by the confluence of brittle technology and excessive lawmaking.

Prefatory note number two: Doctors have to take an oath before they’re allowed to practice. So do legislators. I think this world would be a better place if the legislators’ pledge borrowed this phrase from the doctors’ one: “First do no harm.”

In 2005, Congress passed a law to extend daylight savings time by one month, starting three weeks earlier, and ending three weeks later. This law, the purpose of which was ostensibly to save energy, took effect in March, 2007. There is serious question about whether any energy at all was saved, but very little question about the inconvenience introduced. In the 19th century, when time keeping technology revolved around temperature compensated pendulums and mechanical balance wheels, changing the time was accomplished manually and was usually a minor inconvenience. In the early 20th century, when the timekeeper for most became the electric power company and electric clock technology was based on synchronous electric motors, changing to and from daylight savings time was equally inconsequential.

That’s not the case anymore. I remember the morning of March 11, 2007. I had prepared as best I could by patching the operating systems of all the computers for which patches were available. It didn’t help much. Backups failed because the time stamps indicated that the old files were newer than the files that should replace them. Network protocols got out of whack because of differences in the clocks of network attached computers. But the biggest problems had to do with the synchronization of my Exchange server to its clients, which included PDAs. Appointments moved crazily about like teatime at the Mad Hatter’s whim. It took a few days before I learned appropriate lies for each of the PDAs and nonpatchable laptops and I could get everything synced again.

Three weeks later, there were minor aftershocks as some of the PDAs and laptops sprung ahead on the old schedule. I dealt with those and figured out modifications to the lies to minimize, but not eliminate, the manual intervention.

Gradually over the years updates to the operating systems and discarding of old devices have made things better. This morning I got up with hardly anything extra to do. However, there are still echoes of the 2005 law: in three weeks, my wife’s bedside clock is going to advance itself an hour and wake us up too early.

Technology Hall of Shame

← Tech Hall of Shame: iPad Tech Hall of Shame: JPEG 2000 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.