• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / A disk upgrade

A disk upgrade

October 20, 2009 JimK Leave a Comment

When I got my present workstation last February (for the story, click here), It came with a single 1 TB disk. I planned to put two more in it, since there were supposed to be two free bays. When I opened up the case up to stick the new disks in, one of the bays was really hard to get to; in order to use it, I’d have to reroute almost all the internal wiring. I put a 1 TB drive in the easy-to-get-to bay, and buttoned the case up. I only had about 700 GB of images that I wanted to keep on the desktop, and I figured that, by the time I needed the space, I could put in a bigger disk.

Last week, I noticed that I had used more than 850 GB of space on the image disk, so I looked around on the web. There seemed to be several brands of 2 TB disks available, and I didn’t read many horror stories like those that accompanied the first 1.5 TB drives. I ordered a 2 TB Western Digital Green-Series disk, figuring that quiet, cool, operation and reliability trumped speed for me, since I wasn’t going to store any programs on this drive. The disk arrived in a couple of days, and today I installed it.

First I ran Vice Versa manually, just to make sure I had all the latest files backed up on the server. Then I disabled the script that backs up the Image disk. It wouldn’t do for the backup program to start running in the middle of the restore. Since I told Vice Versa to mirror the source to the target, having a backup run before the files were completely restored would cause data loss as the unrestored files were deleted from the server. Automation is a two-edged sword. It saves time and energy, and keeps you from making small mistakes, but it facilitates making huge ones.

I disconnected the computer and carried it to a workbench. Dell’s no-tools case was easy to open. I had the old drive out and the new one in in less than five minutes. Back upstairs, I connected the cables, started the computer, brought up the disk administration program, registered the disk and gave it a quick format. I prepared a Vice Versa script to restore the backup data to the new disk and turned it loose. It announced that it would be done in about thirty hours. That was fine with me; I’m going to have a new set of images to edit in two days. I set the old disk aside, thinking that I would take it to the bank to be an extra copy of my images.

Why bother writing about this, since it was no big deal and went smoothly?

The first reason is to note how accustomed we are to having advances in technology come along and save our bacon. I am reminded of a sign that I once saw on the wall of the VP Operations of a high-tech company. “Believe in miracles? We count on them!” it proclaimed. Disk data density has been rising at a once-amazing pace for so long that it is no longer remarkable. It hasn’t happened by accident. There are a few breakthroughs and many clever tweaks behind the seemingly-inexorable progress. We ought to stop for a second and thank all the engineers and the few scientists that are making it all possible.

The second reason is to remark upon how cheap disk technology has gotten. With spinning storage hanging in there at about a dime a gigabyte, I didn’t even think of paring down my image collection so that it and the next year’s additions would comfortably fit on my old disk. It wasn’t worth my time. Thank those engineers again.

The third is how long restores take now that the data sets have grown so large. Admittedly, I’m not doing the restore in the fastest way possible, just the easiest. I could have kludged both the old and the new disk temporarily into the workstation and done a disk-to-disk restore. The network restore allows me to use my workstation while it’s running, and also gives me an extra CRC check on every file to make sure there is no lost data.

The fourth is the mistake that I didn’t make. It would have been easy for me to forget that the backup script was running, and wipe out the backup copy.  Since the script that copies the backup copy to the Drobo was running, I’d have lost that data as well. I would have had the original disk, but still, the lesson here is to think through the system operation before you act, and keep extra backups.

The Bleeding Edge

← Flash card data loss Upgrading a Drobo →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.