• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Further thoughts on the Epson 4540

Further thoughts on the Epson 4540

October 22, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

When I did a nozzle test, I was surprised to find that there are four sets of black nozzles, and one set each for cyan, magenta, and yellow. It looks like the printer is optimized for black-and-white (as opposed to color) speed. Given my application, that makes perfect sense.

The printer does a credible job printing photographs on Epson Photo Paper Glossy. It takes 4×6 and 5×7 sheets in the back hopper, so I can print on paper too small for my 4900. It’s not a bad printer for family pix, but, if you want a serious small image, you’ll print to the 4900 and cut it down.

After printing more than 1000 pages, I have not had a single paper jam. I have printed 20 and 24 pound bond paper from the cassettes, and up to 300 GSM paper from the rear tray. I have printed on some HP 80 GSM matte stock that never would feed reliably in the 6250, and the Epson handles it perfectly. The 6250 always left card stock curled from its trip around the EP roller and through the fuser. The Epson inkjet printer leaves the paper flat — a big improvement.

I have yet to see my first clogged nozzle. I leave the printer on all the time, and rarely does a day go by that I don’t print something. Since clogged nozzles are usually a problem in printers that sit idle a lot, my conditions don’t provide a difficult test.

When set for high quality, the printer slows down quite a bit and gets much quieter. I have selected high-quality as my default mode, with the ink density cranked up to a hundred percent. If I want a high-speed print job, I change the settings in the driver before I print.

The Epson is a good all ‘round workhorse home and small office printer. However, there are times when you need to bang off 500 or a thousand pages PDQ, and the 4540 is not the ideal tool for that job. I’m going to keep the 6250 around (turned off, to keep the vampire power drain at bay) for the infrequent times when I need to print a big job fast. With that exception, the Epson 4540 has earned its place as my go-to office printer.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← Epson WP4540 OOBE iPhone 4s OOBE — the preface →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.