the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Epson WP4540 OOBE

Epson WP4540 OOBE

October 11, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

The printer arrived in a very large box, but the container was much smaller than that of a high-function laser printer. It was also much lighter. Unpacking and hardware set up was pretty simple: snap a few parts together and play the usual Epson “see if you can find all the blue tape” game. I like the way that Epson takes the trouble to double the ends of the tape so that it’s easy to remove. At no time during the operation did I feel the slightest need to open the manual. The only odd note in the set up was that the printer takes almost 15 minutes to charge its internal plumbing. At least it requires no user intervention, unlike some of the Epson large inkjet printers that make you to flip levers during the process.

Software set up showed improvements in automation over previous Epson printers that I’ve installed. The installation software on the CD checked the web for updated drivers and downloaded them automatically. I used an Ethernet connection. In the past, this has required manually configuring Windows printer ports, but the installation package automagically went out to the network, found the printer, and set up a port for it.

When the registration form came up, it was already filled out, including the printer serial number. I’m not sure where Epson got my name and address; I’m hoping it was from the registration form for another Epson printer installed on that machine. There are other explanations, and they all make me nervous. If you just want to install the printer driver, there’s a setup program you can download from the Epson web site; it’s the best way to set up computers that don’t need access to the scanning, fax, and copying functions.

The printer doesn’t give the impression of incredible solidity that you get with a $2K laser printer. It’s not as big, partly because it has half-ream paper trays instead of the 500-sheet ones you get with a big laser printer. It’s not as heavy, in about equal parts because it doesn’t need a big imaging drum and a honking 30 page a minute fuser, and because it’s not built for 20,000 pages a month. The output paper tray is as flimsy as you’ll find on any printer at any price, but it’s still completely functional, if a little small.

How’d it print? Read on, for results with plain 20 pound paper.

Speed A 16 page double-sided PDF with moderate graphic content printed in 3:05 using the normal setting and print density set to “text”. The same document took 1:35 on the Xerox 6250, with 15 seconds of that being fuser warm-up time, which you wouldn’t see if you printed a bunch of documents in rapid progression. Like the 6250, the Epson printer partially ejects a page into the output hopper after printing the first side, and then sucks it back into the printer to print the second side. This means that double sided printing takes longer than printing the same document in single-sided mode.

Quality The normal settings produce blacks that are not near as deep as the 6250; manually increasing the print density to “0” makes most of the difference go away. Other than density, text quality appears to be about a wash with the 6250 in normal mode, and better with “fine” or “quality” printing settings.

Permanence A print can be smudged by forcefully dragging a wet finger across the page, unlike the laser printer output. However, pouring liquid water on the surface of a page won’t make the ink run, and trying to scrub off the wetted ink has no effect other than abrading the paper surface. It’s a huge improvement over early inkjet printers.

Noise It’s quieter than the 6250, but the noise is more intermittent since the paper doesn’t feed continuously. Since it doesn’t print as fast, it foes on for a longer time. For annoyance, I’d call it a tie. Neither printer is very noisy.

Overall, it looks like Epson has made compromises on density to get the print cost to below that of comparable laser printers, but the tradeoffs appear to be reasonable ones, and higher quality settings are available in the driver if you choose.

It looks to me that inkjet technology is moving faster than electrophotography. If you’re looking for a medium-speed color office printer with networking and duplexing, xerography is no longer the only game in town. The Epson 4540 is the first, but definitely not the last, of the inkjet challengers to xerography’s hegemony in that market.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← Cutting the laser printer cord Further thoughts on the Epson 4540 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.