• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Keyboards, revisited

Keyboards, revisited

July 22, 2009 JimK 2 Comments

The big brown truck delivered the freshly-manufactured clicky keyboard with a semi-future-proof (in this sense, it’s only the future if I live to see it) connector, and the true-blue IBM Model M ‘board with a semi-hemi modern PS/2 connector. I tried them out without hooking them up to the computer. The USB keyboard felt at least as good as the IBM one, so I swapped it for the Lexmark keyboard that had the strange layout and was missing the number pad.

I worked away happily for almost three weeks. I thought I was finished with keyboard flakiness.  Last night I was typing away when I noticed that the computer was ignoring me. A reboot fixed it. I am now forced to consider that it is the OS after all, and therefore, given the frequency of the occurrence of the error, essentially unfixable. It is extremely unlikely that it could be a hardware problem, since the old keyboard used the PS/2 connection and the new one uses USB.

I also have discarded what was in all likelihood a perfectly good keyboard.

Computers: can’t live with ’em, can’t live without ’em.

The Bleeding Edge

← Waiting for the Muses Keyboard mystery (sort of) solved →

Comments

  1. Kathleen J. says

    July 23, 2009 at 10:02 am

    Just because your OS may be having problems now doesn’t mean that the keyboard wasn’t bad too. I recently made a keyboard switch because some keys on the one I am using now were sticking. That keyboard caused my computer to crash and restart itself several times a day, often in the midst of a blog post or editing in photoshop I tried to remember what I had done recently to cause this problem and realized I had switched out the keyboard. I still have no idea what was wrong with that other keyboard, but now that I’ve changed back, no more crashes!

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    July 23, 2009 at 11:32 am

    To look at it your way, I’d have to believe that two things failed. It’s possible, but unlikely.

    There’s the story about a man with an imperfect knowledge of statistics who carried a bomb on board an airliner. When his friends found out about it, they were aghast. He said it was a safety measure, explaining that the odds of a bomb on an airliner were one in a million, but that the odds of two bombs on the same airliner were one in a trillion.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.