• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Office 2010 crashes: why’d they happen?

Office 2010 crashes: why’d they happen?

July 20, 2010 JimK 3 Comments

In previous posts, I reported that upon upgrading from Office 2007 to Office 2010, corrupted some fonts caused Outlook and Word to crash. There are a couple of possibilities here. Maybe the fonts were fine before the upgrade, and somehow the upgrade corrected them. Maybe the fonts have been corrupted for a long time, and it wasn’t a problem for Office 2007, but is for Office 2010. The first alternative is extremely unlikely, since reinstalling the problem fonts doesn’t fix them.

It is clear, however, that the Helvetica and Times fonts installed on two computers (the only computers on which they are installed) cause Word 2010 to abend, and that Word 2007 was fine with them. This shows a clear lack of defensive programming on the part of the people who designed Word 2010.

There are two arguments against defensive programming. The first is based on performance: programmers argue that checking input variables and datasets causes the app to be pokey. The second is based on minimizing development time: putting in all of those checks and testing them doesn’t come for free. I don’t have a lot of sympathy with either argument; processing speed is getting pretty cheap, dataset testing is eminently parallelizable, and unreliable software puts users through hell.

I’m blaming this whole mess on the Microsoft programmers who let a little thing like an imperfect font crash their app (I used the word corrupted to describe the fonts before, but I think that probably overstates things, since the fonts worked in Office 2007).

The Bleeding Edge

← Another corrupted font, and a mystery The Office 2010 font problem: Microsoft Support →

Comments

  1. Andrew Koenig says

    July 28, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    What I find really remarkable is that I have been unable to find out just what the problems with the fonts are. I am pretty sure that the fonts on my system are not corrupt, but if I uninstall Helvetica, my machine works, and if I reinstall it from the original Adobe distribution files, it crashes.

    The current state is that neither Microsoft nor Adobe will look at the problem becaus each one says it must be with the other company’s software.

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    July 28, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    I’d be more sympathetic to Microsoft if things hadn’t worked so well in Word 2007 and before. Word used to tolerate just about any Adobe font, and now it doesn’t.

    In addition, is there any justification for crashing when you don’t like the font? I think not. Why not throw up an error message?

    Jim

    Reply
  3. Rasmus says

    November 28, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    I have found out that if you have a printer installed that connects via USB, and the printer is unplugged or turned off – Word can not communicate with the printer. What happens is that Word times out and it appears like it has crashed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.