• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / The return of the mainframe, part 2

The return of the mainframe, part 2

June 11, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

Here are the first two areas of concern for cloud computing.

Privacy. So your data is out there in the cloud. The cloud is an abstraction; your data is sitting on somebody else’s disks in one or more of their computer centers. Who is managing those disks?

From one perspective, it’s a bunch of people who you know very little about. You didn’t hire them; your cloud supplier did. No matter what procedures are in place, they can get at your data. Are they selected for their probity? Their scrupulousness? Their lack of curiosity? Their financial stability and immunity to extortion by others? Maybe so, maybe not. Do you even know what country they’re in, and what laws they should obey?

From another perspective, those disks are managed by a company. Much do you know about that company? Do you understand their privacy policies? Do you know the procedures that they use to enforce those policies? Do you understand how important privacy is when compared to other management objectives? If it comes down to rattling legal sabers, do you know whose laws govern your contract with them?

Even if you understand where your cloud provider stands today, it’s really hard to figure out where they’re going. Are they are vulnerable to takeover by a company whose privacy policies you detest? What if the acquiring company’s business model revolves around selling client information? Acquisition is not the only game changing event that can happen to a company. Is your service provider in danger of going out of business? If they do go out of business, what happens to your data? With all the disks be written seven times with random numbers before they are sold? Or will the company be down to a skeleton staff by the time they think about what they’re going to do with the disks, and just sell them as is to the highest bidder?

Scott McNealy famously said once, “You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it.” I don’t think it’s that simple. There’s a risk/reward calculation involved in using a cloud-based service. The reward has to be pretty darn high for me to risk putting financial data there.

Security. Security in the cloud context usually means network security, and that’s a lot like privacy, except that you’re worried about access to your data by anyone with an Internet connection. One of the arguments for cloud computing is that the companies who provide the service are generally motivated to spend more time, money, and effort on security than are people at home or in small offices. I think that’s true as far as it goes, but it needs to be balanced against the fact that the cloud computing companies are much bigger targets, and therefore more likely to attract the attention of ne’er-do-wells. Why go to all the trouble to hack a homeowner’s computer to get one or two credit card numbers when you can hack a big company and get millions? And make no mistake; the big companies do indeed get hacked. Just last Thursday, Citigroup reported that person or persons unknown had made off with more than a hundred thousand names, email addresses, and credit card numbers.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← The return of the mainframe The return of the mainframe, part 3 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.