• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / The return of the mainframe

The return of the mainframe

June 10, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

Cloud computing has been much in the news of late, with Steve Jobs’ announcement the other day adding a little exclamation point. The excitement is approaching giddiness. At the risk of raining on the parade, I thought I’d do a few posts on some of the downsides of cloud computing.

First, let me explain my attention-getting, but slightly misleading title. The similarities between cloud computing and the 70s and early 80s mainframe model are many:

  • Most of the number-crunching is done at a central location
  • Most of the programming, configuration, updating, administration, and maintenance is done by experts with whom the users hardly ever interact
  • The central facility services many users
  • The business model relies on subscription, rental, or lease rather than purchase.

There are also some differences:

  • Most business (as opposed to scientific) mainframes had one or two processors. Cloud computing data centers have thousands.
  • Cloud computing data centers use air cooling for the most part. I think this is a mistake; from an efficiency point of view water cooling can be much better.
  • The instruction set of the computers in the data centers is pretty much the same as that of the users’ hardware; in the mainframe era they were wildly different.
  • Much of the information that flows back and forth between the users’ equipment and the cloud facilities does so over standard protocols, even if they often have odd proprietary twists. In the mainframe era, many of the protocols were wholly proprietary (but sometimes reverse-engineered and emulated, as in the case of the IBM 3270 terminal).
  • The Internet has introduced great flexibility in the physical locations of both users and central facilities; mainframe wide-area networks were essentially private, and changes were not easy or simple.

The cloud computing model offers significant advantages. It frees users from installing new software, which is beginning to seem like an almost constant task in the era of Internet program updates. It offers the promise that technical difficulties can be resolved by experts with no involvement of the user at all, an immense boon now that tech support has been mostly off shored and most tech support “engineers” reduced to reading scripts. There is the promise that oft-ignored maintenance tasks like backup will be performed with discipline and dispatch.

However, there are risks associated with cloud computing. I’ll be examining some of them in the next few posts. It what’s to come, I’m assuming that most of the people reading this blog care about cloud computing in a personal or small business context. The situation for large businesses is more complex. Fortunately for them, they have large IT staffs to do sophisticated risk analysis, and don’t need me to do it for them.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← Living with tech The return of the mainframe, part 2 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2025
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Michael Angelo on Nikon Z7 focus shift shooting
  • Erik Kaffehr on Visualizing lens aberrations — why do it?
  • Eugene on Don’t fixate on the bad stuff
  • Jonby on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • AVN on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • Markus on In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist
  • JimK on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.