• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 50mm f/2 Nikkor-H, 50mm f/1.4 Summilux on alpha 7II

50mm f/2 Nikkor-H, 50mm f/1.4 Summilux on alpha 7II

February 1, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

In 1958, I spent all the money I’d saved from my summer job — $180 — to buy a used Nikon S2 with a 50mm f/2 Nikkor-H lens. I still have the camera, although it has been relegated to the status of ornament since I decommissioned my darkroom. I still have the lens, which has until recently been serving to keep dust out of the camera.

This is not a scarce, rare, expensive lens. You can find them routinely on eBay for around $200.

I also have a Leica 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH, purchased new about seven years ago. This lens is a classic.

Neither lens was designed for the sensor stack thickness of the Sony alpha 7 Mark II (aka the a7II). In fact, they were both designed for film, or for a sensor stack thickness of nil. Both lenses, therefore, struggle a bit on the camera.

Here are both lenses on their intended (recently-intended in the case of the ‘lux) bodies:

_8104816

_8104813

 

The relatively short length of the Nikkor foreshadows possible corner problems, even more than the ones wi already know about for the Summilux. The helicoid for the short Nikon S lenses is in the camera. That means that any adapter to the Sony E-mount has to have a helicoid, or you can’t focus the lens. On the S2 in the picture, you can focus the lens by twisting it, or you can focus with your index finger on the little wheel in front of the shutter release. When the lens is mounted on a Sony alpha 7, you only have the lens-twisting option. It’s sort of a pity, since the little wheel makes it easier to hold the camera steady.

Next to the honey-dipped focusing action and crisp f-stop detents on the Summilux, the Nikkor feels delicate.

It’s interesting to see how cameras have changed in 50+ years.

  • We don’t use flashbulbs any more, so the synch dial on the S2 looks strange.
  • We don’t have to rewind film, so the rewind knob and the advance/rewind collar around the shutter release is now unnecessary.
  • There’s a single shutter speed dial on the M9, a welcome simplification over the two-part prone-to-operator-error dial on the S2.
  • Of course, there’s no film advance required now, so we don’t have the exquisitely-crafted thumb lever that we see on the Nikon.
  • The Nikon lens mount has an infinity lock that you can release with your index finger when you start to focus. There is no such nicety on the Leica.
  • The Nikon has both a hot shoe and a PC connector. The Leica makes do with just the shoe.
  • The Nikon doesn’t have a light meter, or any automatic exposure options.
  • The Leica weighs more, and is thicker.

The first thing you worry about with lenses designed for rangefinder film cameras is light falloff. I ran a test with all the common whole f-stops of both cameras, using an Expodisc as a diffuser. I have not corrected the color differences between the lenses.

Summilux f/2
Summilux f/2
Nikkor f/2
Nikkor f/2

The Nikkor vignettes more.

Summilux f/2.8
Summilux f/2.8
Nikkor f/2.8
Nikkor f/2.8

The difference is smaller at f/2.8.

 

Summilux f/4
Summilux f/4
Nikkor f/4
Nikkor f/4

The Nikkor corners remain a little darker.

Summilux f/5.6
Summilux f/5.6
Nikkor f/5.6
Nikkor f/5.6

Still some difference.

Summilux f/8
Summilux f/8
Nikkor f/8
Nikkor f/8

Almost the same.

Summilux f/11
Summilux f/11
Nikkor f/11
Nikkor f/11

Not quite the same, but real close.

Summilux f/16
Summilux f/16
Nikkor f/16
Nikkor f/16

I call that a wash. Note that corner color casting does not appear to be a problem with either lens.

The Last Word

← Nikon 12-bit raw’s effect on shadow detail The problem with stitching →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.