• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report – getting the pages flat

A book report – getting the pages flat

February 9, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts that I started what seems like a long time ago about getting a book designed and published. The series starts here.

Almost all of the photos in the Staccato series are wider than they are high. Many are a great deal wider than the image height. If you want a book that fits in most shelves, you’re limited to 12 to 14 inch page widths, and 14 is pushing it. So I understand completely why Jerry designed the book with images that spread from one page to the facing one; to do otherwise would have made the images too small, and they would have floated miserably in a sea of whiteness.

Running images through the gutter – as designers call the center of the two page spread — requires that the pages lie fairly flat. Otherwise the distortion of the image is ugly, shadows cast by the pages near the spine fall on the image, and, in extreme cases, you can’t see the image content near the spine of the book.

So I was really interested to get a good look at the book mockup. That’s a book with blank pages and a blank cover, but with the same paper, the same number of signatures, the same binding methods, and the same cover material as the real book will have. You can hold it in your hands and see what the heft is like. You can see if the pages feel right when you turn them. And you can see how flat they lie. That last bit was what was foremost on my mind when I opened the package containing the Staccato mockup.

I didn’t like what I saw.

It did get a little better as I leafed through the book and the pages loosened up, but it never got to what I’d call acceptable. I took a look at the bottom of the book as it lay on a table opened to a page in the middle of the book. The signatures are sewn to a piece of cloth that forms the spine of the book. One side of the cloth is attached to the hard front cover of the book. The other I attached to a piece of paper that slides in a slot on the back cover of the book. The idea is that the cloth spine can flex upwards meaning that the facing pages to which the book is open don’t need to drop down all the way to the level of the spine on both ends of the book, and they’ll lie flatter.

The cloth spine wasn’t bending at all. Oops.

I went to my bookshelf and dug up a photo book about as thick as Staccato; it was the Robinson Jeffers/West Coast Photo Gods book. This was an old copy. The construction technique was the same, but the cloth spine bent upwards nicely when the book was opened.

I called Jerry and complained. Jerry called Hemlock. Hemlock said that they had a meeting with the bindery, and would bring up the issue.

And that’s where it stands. I’m hoping we can ge a more flexible material for the spine.

 

 

The Last Word

← A book report — proofreading Planning for long exposures →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.