• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — the strike test

A book report — the strike test

September 10, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book. The series starts here.

You might be asking, “What is a ‘strike test’?”   If you know, congratulations.  If you are in the dark, just as I was until yesterday, read on.

When we last left the book, it was printed, and we had “folds and gathers” – all pages of the book cut to size with the signatures folded and assembled.  That means the only thing to do is the binding, right?  Not so fast.  Jerry Takigawa, the book designer, had specified that the lettering on the cover and the spine of the book be embossed deeply into the material, and the recessed areas filled with a metallic inlay.  We needed to proof that.

Jerry sent me a PDF of the cover lettering.  It looked good.  The bindery ran off a proof. That’s the strike test.  It arrived at Jerry’s office yesterday.  It turns out that the bindery went an extra mile: they sent Jerry a complete bound book.  Not only that, but they filled the lettering on the cover with a gloss black material, and the lettering on the spine with the specified metallic stuff to show us another treatment.

I met with Jerry yesterday and looked at the book.  It looked really good.  We both are preferred the metallic inlays.  This whole business of embossing and inlaying is probably unnecessary, since 99 percent of the owners of this book will probably never remove the dust jacket, and therefore won’t see the beautiful lettering that Jerry and I, not to mention the bindery, have worked on getting right.  But one of the great things about art is sweating details that almost nobody but the creator is going to care about.

There will be a small run of boxes to hold a copy of the book and a portfolio with the two inkjet prints; it will use the same embossing and inlaying.

The bindery also included the book dust cover.  The laminate that we’re using to make it more durable had just a look that we were hoping for: a slight matte finish that won’t show fingerprints, yet not so rough that it will sap the energy from the cover image.  The dust cover has a French fold, in which extra material at the top and bottom is folded over before the cover is wrapped around the book.  Earlier, I had noticed two potential problems with that arrangement.

First, there were two points of folded material that stuck out at the top and bottom of the inside of the book.  I was afraid that they were going to catch on things and be points of wear.  So we asked Hemlock to make a die to allow rounding the corners.  Second, the parts of the folded material toward the center of the book stuck out.  We asked Hemlock to taper the material that was on the inside of the fold, so that you wouldn’t be able to see the extra layer.

The tapering worked fine.  The rounding at a small unintended consequence: there was a tiny bit of white visible at the corners.  It would be possible to redo the die so that the corner area that’s going to go on the bottom is cut back a little more than the corner area on the top, but that would be expensive, and it may be that the covers have already been cut.  We will leave it as it as.  This detail sweating stuff has its limits.

Jerry had specified black endcaps for the binding, and we got silver ones.  I thought they looked nice, but we agreed that Jerry will find out if they can go back to the black ones.

Since we had a bound book, I opened it up to several of the double page full bleed images to see if the pages lay flat enough.  They did!

I don’t think there’s much more that needs to happen before I get my hands on a few pallet loads of books.

The Last Word

← In image editing, the room illumination matters Roger Cicala on lens testing →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.